Brought to you by Rob Hinkley, with no warranty either express or implied. Currently featuring...
Archive.
 
 
 
 
Also featuring...
The opinion section, in which Rob spouts off.
Photo albums containing, erm, photos.
The Miscellaneous section.
The gallery of "Bush = Hitler" allusions.
Kitten pictures here,
here, here, here
and here
 
 
contact e-mail: address (my PGP key, and you can get PGP from here)
The Sporadic Chronicle
Maybe good, becoming ugly later.
Main
30 Apr 2005
Felix hiding Angel watching the world go by Cats arrived last night - I have cats! Or rather I am looking after a couple of cats for a friend of a friend while she moves house. Two cats - fully grown but tiny. A boy cat called Felix (black with white smudges like the cartoon cat who advertises the catfood), and a tabby girl cat called Angel (slightly rubbish name: I am considering a temporary name change to something less girly).
They've reacted very differently to being moved into a strange house with a strange human. Angel wandered round and had an explore and doesn't seem bothered - even if she hasn't yet learnt to duck her head far enough when she walks under the bed, producing a "clonk" when her head hits the woodwork as she goes underneath and another when she walks out on the other side.
Felix (picture far right) has been mainly hiding - and making a very good job of finding hideouts. Last night he had a quick sniff around the living room and promptly crawled behind the bookcase. By this morning he'd moved to a new hiding place 2 feet away behind some boxes. He stayed there all morning then crept out at lunchtime, went upstairs and spent an hour hiding behind the bathroom door. Then he hid behind the loo for a bit, before sheltering under the bed. I went out to get provisions, and when I came back found that he'd tucked himself into the space between the drawers and the wall (see picture). At time of writing he is back behind the bathroom door, and either asleep or mired in mortal melancholy. I'm sure he'll get over it.

Changing subject completely, all 3 main parties were canvassing like mad in town. There was even an open-topped red double-decker bus driving round festooned in balloons and "Vote Labour" banners - passengers madly waving flags and what sounded like a very low-budget DJ doing his best to whip up the crowds. What's that supposed to achieve? As if someone will see it and think "well I wasn't going to vote for you, but seeing a bus covered in balloons has dispelled any doubts I have about your approach to European integration so now I will." * I talked briefly to the Lib-Dem candidate (a strangely weasel-featured man with shifty eyes), and was suitably unimpressed by his weasel-featured and shifty rhetoric.

*Oh alright yes - after thinking about it I realise it's not actually meant to change anyone's mind, but to encourage existing supporters to turn out and vote.
29 Apr 2005
Riddle me this, dear readers... why does Robin Cook lament the lack of focus on domestic issues because of all the fuss about Iraq, only to spend the bulk of his article fussing on about Iraq instead of focusing on domestic issues?
29 Apr 2005
Yesterday was someone's birthday, but he didn't get any presents. Heh.
29 Apr 2005
Astronomy Picture of the Day is fantastic today:
[Epimetheus and Janus] actually approach each other once every four years, but instead of colliding, the moons deftly exchange orbits and move apart again.
Crikey.
29 Apr 2005
The Guardian's Polly Toynbee, fresh from denouncing those damned substandard voters for being "spoiled children [who] can demand, stamp their feet, refuse to vote, be fickle and whimsical, expecting MPs to act as obsequious valets" and displaying "apathy, ignorance, indifference and sheer selfishness" now moves to blaming the voting system and calling for Proportional Representation. She doesn't explain quite how this would solve any problem, given that the voters themselves are such selfish pig-ignorant childish knuckledraggers. Also unexplained is why, given her concern for pro-European Tories and anti-Blair Labour voters, she wants to move away from the current system (in which voters might get a chance to elect an anti-Blair Labourite or a pro-European Tory chosen to stand by the constituency committee) to PR (in which the parties can select loyal clones to fill the seats they win).
Indeed, the whole connection between MPs and voters via the constituency gets short shrift: "Watch out for those [MPs] who wax pious about their imagined sacramental link with their constituencies - to which we should reply fiddlesticks (or something much ruder)". Quite how responding to criticism by being rude to the critic will improve our democracy is - like so much in Polly's polemics - left unexplained. Any voters like myself who would raise concerns about PR must be victims of our ignorance, indifference and sheer selfishness.

But I do find myself wholeheartedly agreeing with her in one place, where she reveals her grand plan to get PR implemented:
What is needed now, starting on May 6, is a campaign so mighty it sweeps all before it, unstoppable, unarguable, as angry as the Chartists, as big as the anti-war march and the Countryside Alliance combined.
Too right! After all, we know just how effective the anti-war marchers and the Countryside Alliance turned out to be.
28 Apr 2005
One from the stating-the-obvious department. An expert study has concluded that setting off a nuclear bomb underground in a city would kill lots of people. Fancy that.
28 Apr 2005
The shell around the Chernobyl nuclear plant continues to decay towards eventual collapse. A replacement shell is clearly in order, and we have this thing knocking around doing nothing, so we could send it over. Even if it isn't suitable I'm sure Britain's world-leading experience in dome construction can be put to good use.
27 Apr 2005
Via Eric - Silence Of The Lambs, the musical. Some great lyrics:
This guy is pure evil
Right down to the core,
His home's filled with corpses
And poodles and gore!
And on Hannibal Lecter's escape:
Look what he did to this officer's face
He chewed off his cheeks and he sprayed him with mace.
We're all in a tizzy, oh Jesus where is he
Oh where could Hannibal be?

27 Apr 2005
Good to see that the menace of overly political foliage is being stamped upon.
27 Apr 2005
It flies!
26 Apr 2005
In EU Constitution news, Messrs Schroeder and Chirac are resorting to begging and FUD:
"If we vote No we take the responsibility for interrupting 50 years of European construction," Mr Chirac warned at a news conference. ...
Mr Schroeder said the dispute with China [over cheap textiles] highlighted the importance of a Yes vote on the European constitution.
"If a country hit hard were alone, it would be much more difficult to defend itself than if it acted in concert with other countries."
Right. 50 years of construction has given us a trade area that can't even get its act together setting import tarrifs, and this should be fixed by adopting a new constitution?

Further heartening news comes from Holland, where scepticism reigns despite a government non-partisan leaflet and newspaper campaign.
25 Apr 2005
After costing a mere £430M to build, the Scottish Parliament building's windows have to be kept shut. Top quote: "we have had to disable some windows because when they are open, feathers and bird poo fly in". That must be what happens when you scrimp and save on a building's budget.
22 Apr 2005
You may have been wondering how well stocked Britain's blood banks are. Wonder no more.
22 Apr 2005
A surreal moment on this morning's 'Today' programme - writer A L Kennedy complaining that the election campaign lacks coherent debate and concentration on the facts (I paraphrase from memory - if you have Real Player you can listen to her here).

This is the same A L Kennedy who writes fact-deprived and incoherent polemic for the Guardian, including this impressive recent effort:
So I'll soon get to put my little X next to representatives of A) the ginger muppet who can't even get it together to vote against detention without trial. B) Mad Mike "Burn a gippo" Howard, who appears to have been subjected to a partially successful tongue transplant. This is the only feasible explanation for his strangely adhesive pronunciation and tendency to repeat a handgun-waving, foetus-hugging agenda suited to an entirely different country. C) Blair - a term used to describe any blood-spattered piece of ordure. ...
Good one, Alice Alison. "Tony Blair is a poo! We need more coherent debate of the issues. Michael Howard's a funny-voiced gun-waving foetus-hugger!"
21 Apr 2005
Fun in boats:
21 Apr 2005
It's a miracle! A co-worker of mine commented:
"Seems like god has really let himself go a bit - it started off well what with the creation of heaven and the earth in six days, but it's now declined to crappy salt stains underneath motorway bridges that vaguely resemble some long dead celebrity. He's a bit like Dr. Who - used to be good but now it's just embarrasing."
Another sign of impending apocalypse is the cursed witch-chickens:
"Some people tried to shout at them, but the chickens just stared at them"
Ah well, that proves it.
19 Apr 2005
Respect Watch has identified a special task for George Galloway's Mercedes which maybe other cars can't perform quite so well: making quick getaways from people he doesn't want to speak to.

[Update]
Another interesting encounter on Galloway's campaign trail, as he gets buttonholed by an Iraqi and asked tricky questions. Galloway tries to brush Mr Pax away by painting him as a warmonger: "You welcomed the invasion of foreign armies into your country. ... You are a supporter of the war. You are a supporter of the occupation ...". You can go ahead and read what the guy's written, and decide for yourself whether he comes across as a greatly enthusiastic supporter of the war and occupation. It's not how he comes across to me. But the worst bit is this:
Galloway: "Your family joined the puppet government."
In this context "puppet" is no gentle word of political rough-and-tumble. It is the stated position of George Galloway and his party that Iraqi "collaborators" and "quislings" are legitimate targets for the insurgents (who "deserve the support" of his party). That sentence of Galloway's should end with "...so deserve to be killed."

When Galloway replies to Pax's statement that he's helping to build a new Iraq with "That's your point of view, it's not our point of view and you are entitled to your opinion" he means Pax is entitled to his opinion but should - literally - drop dead.

Nice guy, this Galloway chap.
18 Apr 2005
One of the oddest things I've seen in a while is this cartoon song from Hitachi about increasing the density of storage on magnetic disks. Dancing disco bits are featured.
18 Apr 2005
Police monkeys!
17 Apr 2005
Odd, but I'd have thought a "spot-on quickfire" stand-up comedian of "dazzlingly inventive" spontaneity would be better at dealing with hecklers:
Stumbled across your site while I was reading about the Melbourne International Comedy Festival. Lo and behold there’s my name plastered all over it [ie: mentioned in one post]. ...
Write me and tell me who you are and just what it is you do. In fact, tell what you did before weblogs made it possible for every five and dime gasbag with an axe to grind could spout their bile into the ether. Let’s meet up and have a chat, you dumb cunt. ...
Well, I suppose that's... spontaneous, if not dazzlingly inventive. And it is comical, even if not intentionally so.
15 Apr 2005
Brain-related things:
15 Apr 2005
This Is Not Right: on top of a rise in fraud-vulnerable postal votes, soldiers in Iraq are being stuffed. Grrr.

But this is funny:
GEORGE Galloway’s attack on the government’s "obliteration" of home-grown car manufacturers backfired yesterday when he was forced to admit he drove a Mercedes.
At the launch of his anti-war party Respect’s election campaign, Mr Galloway decried "the destruction of British manufacturing" and the demise of MG Rover.
Asked by The Scotsman why he drove a Mercedes if he felt so passionately about MG Rover and the potential axing of 6,000 jobs at Longbridge, Mr Galloway replied: "I drive a Mercedes because there is no Rover equivalent for the tasks my Mercedes has to perform. I wish there was."
Mr Galloway, who was expelled from the Labour Party, drives an S-class model with cream leather interior. He had left a cigar in the parked car’s ashtray while he wooed the media in London yesterday. ...
Truly the man's a working class hero. There's no Rover, or no other British-built car, that can measure up to the tasks his Mercedes has to perform? I presume these arduous tasks are something other than the provision of plush leather-upholstered air-conditioned luxury for George Galloway. Certainly there are some vehicles other than the S-Class Merc (prices from £48,000) which provide essential getting-you-from-one-place-to-another car functionality. If he's so concerned about British manufacturing he could have bought a Jag, for half the price.
14 Apr 2005
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy film, due out shortly, takes crippling flak:
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy movie is an abomination. Whereas the radio show, TV show, books and computer game are all recognisably variations on a theme, this is something new and almost entirely unrelated. It’s not even a good film if viewed as an original work: the characters are unsympathetic, the cast exhibit no chemistry, the direction is pedestrian, the pace plodding, the special effects overpowering (lots and lots of special effects, none of them funny mind you) and above all the script is amazingly, mindbogglingly awful. Oh, and they have taken most of the jokes out.
This is a terrible, terrible film and it makes me want to weep.
I don't think he liked it. And judging by what the long review has to say, and what isn't in the film, I don't blame him.
14 Apr 2005
Wonderful video clip (3MB, WMV format) just forwarded to me, of police dealing with a Dungeons & Dragons shooting incident. '...the boobytrap, set by Goblin sappers...'

13 Apr 2005
The esteemed Members of the European Parliament have voted against making the payment of their generous travel expenses dependent on the draconian and obviously unreasonable condition of actually proving that they've incurred any expense:
The current system allows MEPs to receive tens of thousands of euros a year in first-class travel payments, on top of their annual salary.
They do not have to produce receipts, meaning they can claim the full amount even if they have flown on budget airlines or been given a lift in a car. ...
Gits.

This is the same organisation whose accounts are so shambolic the auditors didn't sign off... for nine years running.

It really is disgraceful. If this was happening in the private sector - with expenses being fiddled and accountants being hounded out of their job when they raise concerns - people would end up going to jail.
13 Apr 2005
Yes, folks... that cute baby duck time of year's come round again.

Awwww.
Mother and ducklings, last weekend.
Mother and ducklings, last weekend.

13 Apr 2005
Richard Norton-Taylor (the Guardian's security affairs editor) is writing today about the radical and disturbing changes in the British and American stance on nuclear weapons:
Both the US and Britain are muddying the waters in ways that will scarcely make non-nuclear states feel more secure. The US has weakened the concept of "negative security assurances" - whereby nuclear states would not threaten or attack non-nuclear states with such weapons - by suggesting that it might use them in response to a biological or chemical attack, or even in other circumstances.
"Negative security assurances" mean never using nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states? Lets see if that's what they've been taken to mean by the people whose interpretation matters most:
[Since] 1978, the United States has pledged not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states that are members of the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), except if attacked by such a state that is allied with a state possessing nuclear weapons. At the same time, successive administrations have maintained a policy of "strategic ambiguity" by refusing to rule out nuclear weapons use in response to attacks involving biological or chemical weapons.
...
On April 5, 1995, Secretary of State Warren Christopher announced a slightly revised policy, which was most recently repeated on February 22, 2002 by State Department spokesman Richard Boucher:
"The United States reaffirms that it will not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon state-parties to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an invasion or any other attack on the United States, its territories, its armed forces or other troops, its allies, or on a state toward which it has a security commitment carried out, or sustained by such a non-nuclear-weapon state in association or alliance with a nuclear-weapon state."
Nor is it new for the US to suggest use of nuclear weapons in reponse to biological or chemical attack, at least not according to this US Army doctrine document, from 1996.
US doctrine in 1996 allows for first use of nuclear weapons The overriding mission of US armed forces is to deter war. Should deterrence fail, the US will prosecute war to a successful conclusion. Should the enemy use [nuclear, biological and chemical] weapons, US armed forces will respond with military operations, which may include nuclear and conventional attacks.
...
The US may use nuclear weapons to terminate a conflict or war at the lowest acceptable level of hostilities. This means we may use nuclear weapons first. Another nation(s) cannot attack us using conventional weapons without risking nuclear war. When faced with a numerically superior enemy, we reserve the right to use nuclear weapons against that enemy. Nuclear weapons use requires Presidential release authority.
...
The US will never use biological agents. Enemy use of biological agents or toxins against US or allied forces will be considered a violation of the 1972 Biological Weapon Convention and possibly the 1925 Geneva Protocol. US policy allows the option of responding to such an attack with conventional or nuclear weapons.
There is nothing new about US strategy allowing for first use of nuclear weapons, and the use of nuclear weapons in response to chemical or biological attack. This is certainly not something that ghastly bellicose Texan has done since he arrived in the White House. Anyone who might expect the security affairs editor of a major national newspaper to know this - and explain it to his readers - is clearly expecting too much.
12 Apr 2005
Cheese News - the source of cheese related news.
11 Apr 2005
London's David Leal puts his finger on the sinister MG Rover / Iraq connection in today's Grauniad letters:
There is a problem with the scenario "we do services and the Chinese make cars": what do we send to China to pay for the cars? It is very difficult to export services - takeaway pizzas cooked in Birmingham won't be bought in Shanghai.
George Bush and Tony Blair have a strategy to deal with this problem: use military power to grab the world's natural resources, and demand tribute from China and the rest of the world.
Eek, it's like the Opium Wars all over again.
08 Apr 2005
News snippets:
08 Apr 2005
This guy, with plans for giant flying windmills, is either a visionary or a total loon. I can't quite decide which.
08 Apr 2005
Polly Toynbee's jumped aboard the "blame the Pope for AIDS" bandwagon. I don't need to reply, because Squander Two's already written pretty much exactly what I have to say.
07 Apr 2005
Quote of the day, I think, from Anthony:
Changing someone's mind about Blair, or for that matter Bush, is a political equivalent of the quest for alchemy.

07 Apr 2005
There's the most amazing leader article in today's 'Independent', related to this heartening news about the pending constitutional referendum in France. Most of the editorial isn't available online without paying them money but I read the paper version and the gist is as follows:
A French "no" to the EU constitution would be a catastrophe, and in large part Tony Blair's fault. If Blair hadn't caved in to pressure to hold a referendum over here, the French government could have got away without holding a referendum too - thereby avoiding the unpleasant possibility of people voting "no".
You see? Because Blair had the gall to let us (horror) vote on constitutional change, the French public got all uppity and demanded the right to (gasp) vote on it as well. This is all most unfortunate because once you give people a say they might vote the wrong way. Why they didn't just go ahead and title it "Damn Fool Lumpenproletariat Shouldn't be Allowed to Make Decisions" escapes me. And the 'Independent' sells itself as a champion of democracy and progressive politics (whatever that means).
07 Apr 2005
People are coming up with homebrew Play-Station mods. Top quote:
"I was on IRC, and someone mentioned how cool it would be to use their PSP on wi-fi at Starbucks to talk to people over IRC. I said, 'I can do that', so I began working on it immediately"
Now there's a man who deserves our respect - even if he does sound like he needs to get out more.
07 Apr 2005
Sad penguin news. I like penguins.
07 Apr 2005
Another sordid tale of prisoner abuse in Iraq:
Saddam Hussein watched the televised election of Iraq's new president from his jail cell yesterday and was "clearly upset", a senior official said.
The poor lamb.
06 Apr 2005
I was going to write a rapier-sharp post about the complacency the government is displaying towards postal voting fraud*, recently denounced by a judge as being "worthy of a banana republic", but I've been overcome by a wave of fatigue at the prospect and felt the motivation almost physically drain out of me. Perhaps tomorrow...

Anyway. Here's some nice pictures of fluffy clouds I took this evening:
clouds clouds
I'm off to the pub.

* Hell, we're only in the run-up to a general election, for gods' sakes - I mean what could possibly go wrong by pressing ahead with a vulnerable voting system? Grumble mutter mutter, fools, the lot of 'em. Fools, I tell you.
06 Apr 2005
Way to damn with faint praise:
Michael Howard may disgust many Samizdata readers by being just another opportunist political hack, but he is nevertheless, I would say, a much more impressive and consequential figure than his two predecessors at the head of the Conservative Party.
His predecessors, of course, being... erm, some guy and... the other one.
04 Apr 2005
Think that clever fingerprint-recognition systems will stop people pinching your keys to steal your stuff? Think again:
They stripped Mr Kumaran naked and left him by the side of the road - but not before cutting off the end of his index finger with a machete [so they could disarm the car's immobiliser].
Thanks, Dave (and I'm sorry about the tasteless puns about fingering the culprits etc).
04 Apr 2005
The Welsh are a filthy nation who live in squalor, a survey has revealed:
[The survey found] just 5% of people in Wales got satisfaction scrubbing a toilet.
Just 5%? Of course, the whole thing's complete bunk, having been commissioned by a supplier of household cleaning products. So it's a bit like those surveys that say things like "83% of people said they felt happier when they spent more on their lunchtime sandwich - according to a survey carried out by the Expensive Sandwich Company" or "People with blond hair really are more attractive to the opposite sex - so says a study released today by Hair Bleach Inc."
04 Apr 2005
Whatever would we do without government advisory committees ?
Proposals to send Britain's nuclear waste into space or to the bottom of the sea are impractical, a government advisory committee has warned.
Insightful.
03 Apr 2005
Abbey, flag at half mast The flag on the abbey was at half mast today, presumably out of respect for the Pope, which was nice. I note that the inpatients at Truthseeker are on the alert, taking the opportunity to repost on their front page a warning that the Pope was "a part of the Luciferian conspiracy to create a totalitarian world government":
... I present this material because it is consistent with the emerging picture of an organized Satanic Conspiracy to subvert mankind. ...
[*rolls his eyes*].

That inspired me to look around for more crankery, and I was quite impressed by the Freedom Files 'Hidden Technology' page, with its picture of an "antigravity rotorless helicopter landing in top secret military area":
This might be true. Some claim the picture is doctored. It looks pretty real to me.
Judge for yourself, as he kindly provides a link to the relevant page of the Laserway Anti Gravity Research Division, which extensively documents this groundbreaking leap in technology. Mmmm... convincing.

There's a lot more at Freedom Files. Modern medicine is a fraud! George Bush Snr invented AIDS! It's somehow all the fault of the Dutch! But the cherry atop the cake's icing has to be this 5 minute video of the outstandingly batty David "The World's Being Taken Over By Alien Lizards" Icke telling us how a Seattle policeman and an angry hotel guest turned out to be real live shape-shifting alien lizards. It's a 10MByte download and in evil Windows Media format, but I swear you won't be disappointed. It's all about "thinking outside of the frequency range", apparently.
01 Apr 2005
I know this is very bad of me, but a small part of my brain expects that at lunchtime the Pope will bound out onto the balcony of the Vatican, do a little dance and shout "April fools!" while all the cardinals roll about laughing in the background.
31 Mar 2005
When I heard about this plan I thought "cool!":
A huge aquarium is to be built on the site of a disused brick works in Bedfordshire. The bio-dome complex at Stewartby near Bedford will rival the Eden project in Cornwall, cover 40 hectares and be enclosed under massive domes. ...
Fantastic. Usual caveats apply about spending public money apply (quite how much public money's involved isn't clear), but - woo-hoo - a giant bio-dome thing full of fish and lizards and stuff. How amazing is that?
Well, certain people think it's not amazing at all. Positively evil in fact. Because it involves animals, and they're very concerned about animal rights:
Justina McLennan, of Bedford Animal Action, said research has shown that fish suffer stress in aquaria.... Ms McLennan said: "Fish and reptiles shouldn't be kept in a confined environment. We're afraid that what is being marketed as a conservation project will in fact be nothing more than an animal-testing facility." ...
Well knock me down in surprise that "research has shown that fish suffer stress in aquaria". I have no doubt fish suffer stress in the wild as well, but research hasn't shown it because fish in the wild - almost by definition - can't be studied as closely as fish in aquaria. Please get a grip and shut up.

The grumblers had a meeting this week to discuss what to do. With luck they will decide to continue their strategy of parading about carrying shrill signs, and dressing up in giant fish costumes. Because nothing says "I have an important point to make which deserves to be taken seriously" quite so well as dressing up as a giant fish.

I like this project more and more. Not only a giant greenhouse, but a potential medical and nutritional bonanza too, according to its opponents:
Shockingly, not only will NIRAH be an aquatic zoo, but it will also house a laboratory in which drug company and university scientists will carry out research on aquatic or semi-aquatic animals, to investigate the 'biomedical potential' hidden in the toxins, venoms and secretions they produce.

Even more scandalous are plans to conduct research into ways of farming some of the fish and reptiles for meat in their native countries
They say that as if they're bad things: "New medical knowledge - oh, it's shocking! Figuring out new ways of feeding people - that's even more scandalous!"
31 Mar 2005
Those North Korean medical scientists have done it again, this time developing a new Nerve Activator*, according to the North Korean News Agency:
It simply removes affection by geomagnetism ... and extends the wobbling width by 5-10 years.
Any extension of the wobbling width is a good thing.

[*NB: Better than previous Nerve Activators. This one's got seaweed extract in it.]
29 Mar 2005
Photos from pedalling round on my bike over the long weekend:
Signal mast behind layers of razor wire Ruins of the old house at Gorhambury, near St Albans Farm machinery
I haven't ridden the bike for ages - but I didn't fall off, didn't get too spooked by traffic, and didn't collapse from exhaustion. I had one mechanical malfunction, when cross-beam come out of skew on t' treadle or something, and I managed to fix that in no time. I was dead impressed even if I do say so myself.
27 Mar 2005
This is odd. Famous and fearless investigative journalist John Pilger, who asks the questions others don't dare, addressed an end-the-occupation rally in Sydney last weekend (also reported in ZMag) and said the following about the western media bowing before Bush-and-Blair's-lie-machine™:
Is there no shame that, in its annual review of press freedom three years ago, the international media monitoring organization, Reporters Without Borders, placed Australia 41st in the world. Countries with greater press freedom were the following: Lithuania, Bosnia, El Salvador, the Dominican Republic, Bulgaria, Hong Kong. ...
Reporters Without Borders placed Australia 41st in the world for press freedom three years ago? That must have been in their "first worldwide press freedom index (October 2002)", which placed Australia... in joint 12th place with Belgium, scoring a mere 3.5 non-freedom points out of 100. That report puts Australia clearly ahead of Hong Kong (18th freest press with 4.83 points) and El Salvador (joint 33rd place), which was ahead of Bulgaria in 38th place and Bosnia in 43rd place with 12.5 non-freedom points. Lithuania and the Dominican Republic aren't mentioned at all, so I can't imagine how John Pilger thinks they came above Australia. Unless he just made it up. He rants on:
... None of this, or the reasons why, are ever mentioned at the numerous back scratching awards ceremonies so beloved by the Australian media.
Quite possibly because it's not true.
26 Mar 2005
Good stuff in this month's 'Scientific American': realistic simulations of epidemic disease (researchers' site), common cosmology mistakes that people make, and robot camel jockeys.
24 Mar 2005
Sorry, a couple of bits which I missed earlier:
24 Mar 2005
More bits and bobs:
23 Mar 2005
Various bits and bobs:
23 Mar 2005
Further to yesterday's post about Eugene Jarecki's film, I've done some more research. One thing's for certain; Jarecki's inaccurate statement that the US spends more on defence than everything else combined cannot be blamed on a lack of relevant information. Indeed, the White House alone provides a giant torrent of budget-related documents.

Of particular reader-friendly clarity and interest are the summaries of spending on various areas from 1948 to 2004 (tables 15.4 and 15.5 of the Historical Tables - PDF format), available as both dollar figures and a percentage of GDP. From a peak in the early 1950's, US defence spending has been on a generally downward slope, both as a proportion of government spending and as a proportion of GDP. When Eisenhower mentioned the "military-industrial complex" in his 1961 speech, the US spent just over half of its federal budget and 10% of GDP on the military. Even then, when state and local government is included nearly twice as much was spent on non-military activities. Since then defence spending has dropped to 20% of the federal budget and 4% of GDP. Eugene Jarecki mentioned on 'Start the Week' that he'd been particularly struck by a bar chart allegedly showing today's defence spending dwarfing everything else, so I've put the spending figures from the White House budget tables into eye-catching graph form below. Gasp as the military consumption of national wealth drops over time! Be amazed as the federal government ends up spending four times as much on other things as it does on defence!
source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2006/pdf/hist.pdf tables 15.4, 15.5
Euegene Jarecki claims the American government today spends twice as much on defence as everything else combined. The last time this was true of federal spending was in 1955, and it has never been true of total government expenditure - at least not since before 1948.

I found this out in less time than it will take to watch his supposed "documentary". What on earth has his producer at the BBC (or commisioning editor, or whatever the person's called) been doing?
22 Mar 2005
This post has grown from a comment I made over at Eric's place.
Radio 4's 'Start The Week' yesterday included stuff about the "military-industrial complex", with the director of a programme to be broadcast tomorrow evening on one of those new-fangled digital TV channels which I don't have the hardware to receive. About 5 minutes into the programme (Real Audio), the following claim is made of how interlinked the military is with every aspect of American industrial and political life:
A very good indicator is what we call the the discretionary federal budget, which is really just a breakdown of what is spent on the various aspects of our civil life in America - from healthcare to education, transportation, umm, and what you do see when you break these catagories down is that essentially the military spending is twice all the other subjects combined and so essentially we now spend as much on the miltary as we do on everything combined plus a great deal.
The impression given is the US government spends twice as much on the military as it does on everything else combined. Big claim - and also utterly untrue. What we are not told is that discretionary spending "is about one-third of all federal spending". That means military spending is less than one quarter of the federal budget (a lot, but much less than "twice as much as everything else combined"). And the federal budget is only a part of all US government spending, because it excludes state budgets - which is where the responsiblity for most educational funding lies.

Also questionable is the claim (about 3 minutes into the audio) that because weapons procurement is spread throughout the country critics of a project can "never bring the weapon system up for questioning". What, never? That would come as a surprise to backers of the lumbering behemoth which was the Crusader self-propelled howitzer:
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld announced yesterday he intends to cancel the Army's $11 billion Crusader artillery program ...
Okay, I grant you - cancelled so money could be spent on other military projects. But cancelled nonetheless despite people having jobs and votes depending on it. And what of the Comanche stealth helicopter, with its 20 years of development and billions of dollars already spent? Cancelled as a white elephant, despite all the votes and jobs and favours which would have been depending on it.

To pre-empt critics: no I do not believe everything is okay with US defence spending. Yes, the US defence spend - like that of every other country - is inefficient and horribly politicised. But let's please have fact-based criticism.

[Update, 23 March: more on this]
19 Mar 2005
Oh, wow, there's enough nutcakes to feed a regiment over at The Truth Seeker. Top stories include... And my personal favourite so far: that so-called "terrorism" is camouflage for some sort of unspecified depopulation plan. Highlights include:
[Remember] the behind-the-scenes manipulation of Japan which compelled it to invade Pearl Harbor, which Franklin Roosevelt then used as an excuse to attack Germany. ...
Erm. okay.
Almost no one I know of believes the official version of what happened in the murder of President Kennedy. After 40 years of discussion, it seems like Michael Collins Piper’s “Final Judgment” furnishes the final word on the matter, that JFK was dusted because he demanded Israel open its nuclear facilities for inspection, and that he wanted to diminish the power of the Federal Reserve, so these two entities got together and concocted an elaborate scheme to blame a CIA groupie for the crime and used a CIA hit team to do the deed, with the fatal shot actually being fired by the driver of the presidential limo. You haven’t read that in the New York Times lately, have you?
No I haven't, and I can't think why.
18 Mar 2005
Top surreal moments at the end of this morning's 'Today' programme (Real Audio clip):
17 Mar 2005
Apologies for the delay in getting around to writing about this - for which I blame laziness. The front page of Monday's Guardian carried a photograph of the summit of Kilimanjaro, from a book released by the Climate Group to illustrate the threat posed by global warming. You see, Kilimanjaro's snow has been melting, which the Climate Group warns us is a dramatic example of what our industrialised society has wrought. CO2 emissions cause global warming... and the snow on Kilimanjaro is melting... therefore Kilimanjaro's snow is melting because of our CO2 emissions... stands to reason, no?

Well, no. Or at least it might, if there weren't some other less tenuous cause for the dwindling of the mountain's snow cover. Such as local deforestation changing the patterns of cloud formation and snowfall.

As an aside, if the Climate Group wishes to be taken seriously on the subject of African mountains it would help if their own publicity material didn't demonstrate ignorance of African mountains:
Corrections and clarifications -- Wednesday March 16

A photograph of a mountain identified as Mount Kilimanjaro was actually of Mount Meru, a neighbouring peak on the Tanzanian border (Meltdown, page 5, March 14).

The error is contained in the book from which the photograph was taken, Northsoutheastwest, published by The Climate Group and the British Council. The front page picture was, as stated, of Mount Kilimanjaro.
Whoops.
16 Mar 2005
In more upbeat robot news, those clever Finns have developed a splendid walking lumberjack robot (albeit manned - does that mean it's not really a robot?)
Via Defence-Tech though of course the robot, having only 6 legs, is an insect-bot rather than a spider-bot).
16 Mar 2005
Oh, nothing brightens up the day quite like wino junky teenage pregnancy news:
Robotic dolls that behave like babies addicted to drugs and alcohol are being used to teach teenagers on Teesside the dangers of drink and drugs. ... They shake and scream as they go through withdrawal and teenagers in the area will be asked to look after them single handedly for two nights. ...
That it's necessary to do this is just too depressing for words.
15 Mar 2005
Sam's guide to how to destroy the Earth is funny.
You've seen the action movies where the bad guy threatens to destroy the Earth. You've heard people on the news claiming that the next nuclear war or cutting down rainforests or persisting in releasing hideous quantities of pollution into the atmosphere threatens to end the world.

Fools.

The Earth was built to last. ...
(Thanks for the link, Dave).
13 Mar 2005
The latest from the troubled mind of "private investigator" Joe Vialls... "Bush Ordered Attack on Sgrena and Calipari":
Nicola Calipari was already 220 yards inside Baghdad Airport's security perimeter when he received an incoming call on his cell phone. Calipari said "Yes?" and instantly recognised the positive ident trap. As Deputy Chief Calipari cursed & threw himself across Giuliana Sgrena to protect her, the kill team from Langley fired more than 300 bullets at their car. ...
Joe... how do you know any of that? What on Earth is a "positive ident trap"? Why, if a "kill team" really fired more than 300 bullets at her car, did Sgrena survive? It might be relevant that the first link in the "other links" section of Joe's front page is to a merchant of marijuana seeds and marijuana smoking accessories.
13 Mar 2005
A house a few minutes walk from mine has this ornament above the garage door:
'Aztec / Russian doll' heads 'Aztec / Russian doll' heads
I think it beats all other house decorations into a cocked hat.
09 Mar 2005
Via Exclamation Mark, the excellent Ming the Merciless Visual Gallery.
09 Mar 2005
Well, this report had a disappointing headline. When they said "surprise appearance" I thought they meant he'd popped out out of a giant cake at a party, going 'ta-daaa', or something.
08 Mar 2005
Oh deary me, it seems that no sooner does someone die nowadays than the conspiracy therories start - in this case that Hunter S Thompson didn't kill himself, but was murdered for working on a story exposing the September 11th attacks as an inside job:
He'd been working on a story about the World Trade Center attacks and had stumbled across what he felt was hard evidence showing the towers had been brought down not by the airplanes that flew into them but by explosive charges set off in their foundations. Now he thought someone was out to stop him publishing it: "They're gonna make it look like suicide," he said. "I know how these bastards think . . ." ...
Sounds a lot like a professional hit with a silencer ...
Absolutely batty. Next week; how Tommy Vance was bumped off by the CIA, using lasers, for playing music George Bush doesn't like much.
08 Mar 2005
Spider-Man's Greatest Bible Stories are brilliant.
08 Mar 2005
Hold the front pages: George Bush and Tony Blair have been found guilty of war crimes by the International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq! Why weren't we told about this before? I don't suppose the "International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq" might in fact be a small group of protestors giving themselves a grand name but having no jurisdiction or authority whatsoever...
[Kohki Abe, a professor of law at Kanagawa University] is the chief justice of a four-person panel of the International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq (ICTI) that has judged the two leaders guilty of a series of charges.
Ah. Riiight.
Abe said: "The people's tribunal does not have any binding force, and critics say that makes it useless because it doesn't have any power."
Yes, I suppose critics do say that. And they're right.
08 Mar 2005
Having been busier than normal in the real world I've been rather neglecting the site lately. An overdue miscellany:
28 Feb 2005
Attention, squirrel enthusiasts; the nation's squirrels need you.
28 Feb 2005
In the unintentionally comic Socialist Worker letter of the week, Linda Carruthers enthuses about the art displayed in Gateshead's Baltic Gallery:
Artists Bob and Roberta Smith's exhibition Help Build the Ruins of Democracy is a call to action. The exhibition space has been developed with visitors to the gallery, who have been invited to contribute their own texts and help create panels.

The first panel was a beautiful screen print that read "ART not WAR". As you make your way round the space you are bombarded with various texts that read "Tony Blair is a zombie of death", "Clare Short blew it" and "The Labour Party are weasels and vipers, forked tongued turncoats who have spattered British people’s faces with blood".
Right on, sister.

For the benefit of readers who were, like myself, previously unaware of Bob and Roberta Smith's work, they are the creators of such works as indignant protest collages bearing the thought-provoking "David Aronavich [sic] is a wanker" and "What a filthy stinking compost heap of perversion is the Guardian where liberals beat their chests about third world poverty and how terrible war is while masterbating [sic] over whether it is okay to have pheasant in your focaccia sandwich and is Ikea shit?"

[Brief pause to expel deeply unwelcome mental image of Guardian readers masturbating over focaccia sandwiches]

That's quite enough art news for now.
28 Feb 2005
Something's certainly going on in Lebanon; with demands for Syrian withdrawal and resignation of the entire government. I fully expect that tomorrow or on Wednesday Robert Fisk will tell everybody that he'd seen this coming in advance... but hadn't quite felt the need to tell anyone at the time.
25 26 Feb 2005
I'm a bit slowing catching this, for which I proffer my apologies. Four days after finding nothing better to write about than nostalgia for the steam trains of his youth, award-winning Middle East correspondent Robert Fisk had plenty to say... about the battleships of the late 19th century. Now we've had Fisk on steam trains and Fisk on steam ships. What's next in this series: Fisk on the pioneers of hot air ballooning, perhaps?

Oddly, the Independent's readers educated in maritime history seem to think Robert Fisk was talking nonsense:
Robert Fisk's assertion that "Incredibly, Tryon's deputy was none other than John Jellicoe" is astonishing. As a commander young Jellicoe was Tryon's junior by four ranks. He was second in command of Victoria, but that is a very far cry from second in command of the Mediterranean Fleet.
But hey, it's reassuring to know that nothing remotely newsworthy's happening in Lebanon isn't it?

[Update: For some reason I went through the whole of Saturday thinking the date was the 25th instead of the 26th, so got the date wrong on the post.]
24 Feb 2005
Ancient cat.
24 Feb 2005
While I have no doubt that his death is a genuine tragedy to his family and friends, I confess I cannot understand why the loss of Hunter S Thompson is being treated as a blow to literature, humanity and journalism generally:
It was as national affairs editor of Rolling Stone that Thompson achieved his international reputation as the founder of "gonzo journalism", a hybrid of fact and fiction, fuelled by the real or imaginary intake of drugs and alcohol.
Because obviously, taking a load of drugs and then writing a semi-fictional account of what's happened is so much better than just writing down the facts of what happened.

His death has also sparked some truly tedious angst poetry.
24 Feb 2005
You know how all that stuff about the EU assuming more powers for itself via the constitution is crazed rabid irrational europhobe nonsense spouted by swivel-eyed foreigner-hating loons? Oh yes it's all lies, spewed forth by xenophobic kneejerk little-englanders like, erm, the Spanish Prime Minister.
24 Feb 2005
Long time no update. I've been busy, busy, busy. Anyway, to business...
The web's favourite nutter, Joe Vialls, now claims to have "conclusive proof" that the Boxing Day Indonesian earthquake was caused by a nuclear bomb. The "conclusive proof" seems to be that immediately after the earthquake in 2004 Banda Aceh looked quite different to San Fransisco in 1906, after it suffered an earthquake and four days of fire.

And, naturally enough in the brain of Joe Vialls, the Lebanese ex-PM was killed by... an Israeli nuclear bomb:
Characteristic white mushroom cloud rises above Beirut, marking the nuclear murder of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and thirteen of his associates.
"Mushroom cloud"? That's a smoke plume. And Joe adds two more to his ever-growing list of alleged Israeli nuclear bombings (don't forget that the Bali, Baghdad, Jakarta and Taba bombs were Israeli nuclear bombs, too) with the Beirut barracks attacks back in 80's:
Then on 23 October the same year [1983], Jewish 'Special Forces' war criminals detonated two Dimona micro-nukes outside the American and French marine barracks in Beirut, killing 241 and 58 soldiers respectively. As with the murder of Rafik Hariri in 2005, western media outlets tried to 'false flag' Hezbollah and Syria for the atrocities.
What is this obsession the man has with nuclear bombs? He can't just try to to blame Israel for blowing people up with bombs - that's not enough for him - Israel always has to blow people up with nuclear bombs. I think I might send him a t-shirt printed with something appropriate like "I exposed the Zionist Cartel setting off nukes, and all I got was this crappy T-shirt".
17 Feb 2005
Gary Younge, The Guardian's bloke in the States, tries to inform his readership about press freedom and the U.S Constitution today, but sadly trips over his shoelaces and falls flat on his face while doing so:
Two journalists facing jail for refusing to reveal their sources had their appeal quashed yesterday. A panel of three judges panel ruled unanimously that they had no constitutional right to withhold the identity of their contacts from a criminal investigation.

The case has wide-reaching ramifications for freedom of the press in the United States. Judith Miller of the New York Times and Matthew Cooper of Time Magazine have been held in contempt of court for refusing to answer questions before a grand jury.

The two journalists claimed that the leaks from government sources of a covert CIA officer's identity were protected by First Amendment privilege, which exempts reporters from revealing their sources to a criminal inquiry. ... [My emphasis] ...
The First Amendment exempts reporters from revealing their sources to a criminal inquiry? Let's see what it actually says:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Now of course a journalist could say "forcing me to reveal a source would compromise my ability to do journalism in future, thereby making the press less free". But the wording of the Amendment seems to give no greater freedom to the press than it does to speech generally. A non-journalist could say "making me honour my 'truth, whole truth etc' oath in court would force me to say things I don't want to, thereby reducing my freedom of speech". Nobody would expect that to stand up, so why should the journalist's argument? It's a tricky one... if only there were some sort of court or other referee (let's hypothetically call it a "supreme court") who could rule on exactly what protections the Constitution does and doesn't afford.

Back to Younge, a few paragraphs later:
The panel cited a 1972 supreme court decision, Branzburg v Hayes, when a reporter was forced to testify about the production of illegal drugs. They said that the supreme court's "transparent and forceful" reasoning applied to the two reporters before the appeals court. ... "the [supreme] court stated that it could not 'seriously entertain the notion that the First Amendment protects the newsman's agreement to conceal the criminal conduct of his source, or evidence thereof, on the theory that it is better to write about a crime than to do something about it'." ... [My emphasis] ...
The supreme court is the ultimate interpreter of the U.S. Constitution, and Younge himself tells us that in 1972 they specifically ruled that the First Amendment doesn't exempt reporters from revealing their sources to a criminal inquiry. So why did he tell us earlier that it does? And as for those "wide-reaching ramifications for freedom of the press in the United States" which he mentioned, surely the only ramification is that, erm, the situation remains exactly as it has been since 1972.

Agh! Aren't these journalist people supposed to have editors or something?
16 Feb 2005
Leonard Nimoy's brief and rather regrettable music career.
16 Feb 2005
The Museum of Food Anomalies made me laugh so much it hurt.
15 Feb 2005
News quote of the day:
"We are hoping the community will help by collecting poo for us and dropping it off in plastic bags. New or old, we'll take it all"
I'm sure people will be only too happy.
15 Feb 2005
Unintentionally comic Socialist Worker letters of the week:
I vaguely remember at the age of six being aware that something was happening outside of my world. It was 1997 and Tony "Bliar" had just been voted in as prime minister.
Little did I know it was to be the beginning of a reign of terror. Since then Blair (with help from George Bush) has sent hundreds of troops to kill and be killed.
Blair says he's interested in education. But at our school - which is meant to be a sports school - the equipment is falling apart due to lack of government funds. We only have four pingpong balls, which you can buy for 25p! As young people - I'm 13 - we deserve to hear about politics and we deserve a say in how our country is run.
Fear the reign of terror of inexpensive pingpong balls. And everything's so unfair!
I found your article "Is alcohol the demon drink?" (Socialist Worker, 5 February) interesting, although I feel you were too soft on the temperance movement.
Groups like Alcoholics Anonymous are god cults. And they are dangerously wedded to a bourgeois medical profession that is in turn wedded to the pharmaceutical industry.
The bourgeois medical profession? Is this the 1920s?
15 Feb 2005
Writing in today's Independent about Monday's killing of the former Lebanese PM, Robert Fisk tells us his award-winning Middle East Correspondent antennae had been quivering in advance:
We knew something was coming. I had met an old journalist colleague for coffee on Saturday and we both said we felt there was a new, menacing atmosphere about Beirut. We didn't mean the sky-high prices and the usual corruption stories, but the incendiary language in which Lebanese politics was now being conducted. ...
I'm not saying that's untrue, but it seems odd that on Saturday Robert Fisk hadn't thought to mention these gathering Lebanese stormclouds to his readers. One could almost have been forgiven for thinking he had nothing of interest to report, so was forced to fill that day's column with reminiscences about the steam trains of his childhood:
With a spare hour on my hands before lunch in Lebanon this week, I revisited the joys of my childhood, crunched my way across the old Beirut marshalling yards and climbed aboard a wonderful 19th-century rack-and-pinion railway locomotive. ... All my life, I have been fascinated by trains. My mother used to take me down to Maidstone East station in Kent to watch the tank engines pull their local trains in from Ashford or the old Second World War Super Austerity class steamers - big, ugly beasts with a firebox the shape of a squashed toilet roll - with a mile of rusting trucks in tow. ...
Clearly that's far more important than any impending regional cataclysm.
11 Feb 2005
I'm still having great fun over at the Ablution standing in for Scott. Issues of note:
11 Feb 2005
There's just no pleasing people, is there? They always say they want honesty in politics, and plain speaking from politicians, but when they get it they start complaining.
09 Feb 2005
Today I've been posting over at The Daily Ablution, to cover during Scott's absence.
08 Feb 2005
The National Association of Kebab Shops:
The National Association of Kebab Shops was founded in January 2003 and is a voice for the often-unheard British Kebab Industry.
Often unheard, but frequently stepped around on the pavement.
08 Feb 2005
Haven't posted in ages... cobble something together quick:
03 Feb 2005
I know you've probably been asking yourself "where can I find The Last Samurai rendered in Lego form?" The answer is ... here.
03 Feb 2005
Graveyard of the post boxes.
03 Feb 2005
A Lego ninja-themed chess set. Also, a Lego great wall of China.
02 Feb 2005
A history of helmets, from 'Invention & Technology' magazine.
02 Feb 2005
Amazing colour photographs from WW1. Now of course at this point you are probably thinking the same thing I did when I saw them:
That's impossible... everybody knows World War One was fought in black and white. They must be black and white photos which were coloured in afterwards.
Ah, but they are proper colour photographs and, believe it or not, the technology behind them was potato-based.

01 Feb 2005
It's not often that kidnap and threats of killing are funny, but this is just remarkable. The jihad warriors in Iraq claimed to have captured an American soldier. They even release a photograph to back up their claim. But then people looked upon the photograph and they said; "dude, that looks, like... totally wrong". And then others looked upon the photograph and they said; "he does seem to be posed rather stiffly and that banner in the background isn't hanging properly and the writing on it does look sort of wobbly and cack-handed". Then others looked upon the picture and found its all contents in a toy catalogue. The jihad warriors in Iraq said:
Look, we're not kidding! Our mujahadeen heroes of Iraq's Jihadi Battalion were able to capture this American military man John Adam - who really does exist and is much more than one foot tall - after killing a number of his comrades and capturing the rest. We swear this is true. See how authentic he looks, with his realistic hair and his gripping hands. God willing, we will behead him - who is certainly not a child's toy - if our female and male prisoners are not released from US prisons within the maximum period of 72 hours from the time this statement has been released. Oh yes. We mean this. See how he has a full array of realistic accessories. God is great, and all sorts of stuff like that. Accept our demands or burn in toytown hell, you infidel sons of pigs and monkeys!
An American army spokesman replied: "Huh? We've not lost anybody."
An Action Man doll under threat of death in Iraq yesterday

I mean... did these people really think nobody would notice?
01 Feb 2005
How extraordinary. Coffee from beans which have been thrown up by Vietnamese weasels.
Weasels roam the coffee plantations and eat the ripe coffee beans, but rather than digest them the weasel regurgitates them and vomits them up ...
Due to the fact the cherries have been in the weasels gastric juices, it seems to dramatically alter the taste of the coffee once brewed

The mind boggles. It's very expensive, but I suppose that's because a man has to go around the coffee plantation with a bucket, scooping up little puddles of weasel vomit. That sort of thing doesn't come cheap.
Amazing coffee weasel coffee, from edible.com

December, January. Archive.