|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Yes. I do. I said it was right back in February and I haven't seen anything to make me change my mind.
Suffice to say the guy makes a drunken woodlouse look like a mental powerhouse.A drunken woodlouse who's been smoking crack. Here's the text from the Bin Laden and Donald Rumsfeld cards:
Bin Laden: "CIA agent tasked with fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan, then
spreading discord between Arab nationalists and islamists, finally to
provoke the clash between the Arab-Muslim and Judeo-Christian worlds."
Ah, yes, the crusty old "Bin laden was a CIA agent" meme. Shame it isn't true.
Rumsfeld: Secretary of defence, he predicts the 11th Sept attacks 2 minutes before they happen. Then instrumental in raising military budgets and starting to build a space army able to dominate the Earth."
A space army? Cool. Where do I sign up?
Sorry to rant, but Meyssan and his little imps just irritate me something rotten.
If Iran is declared to be in breach of the treaty banning the spread of nuclear weapons - the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) - at the next IAEA board meeting in November, the UN Security Council could be asked to get involved.And then things will get really serious:
That could result in economic and political sanctions against Iran.That'll show them!
At the climax of a military parade ... enormous Shehab-3 missiles were rolled out painted with the messages, "We will crush America under our feet' and "Israel must be wiped off the map."Prediction: the Israelis will bomb the Iranian nuclear plants before this year is out. I don't see how they have any choice.Iran later announced that it would scale down cooperation with the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency. Ali Akbar Salehim, Tehran's envoy to the IAEA, said on state television that Iran had been allowing the agency more oversight than required under the nuclear nonproliferation treaty "to show our goodwill and transparency."
"When I sit here and watch the local TV news and somebody's talking to me who's six-foot three with fantastic cheekbones, great hair and false teeth, I think: 'Do they know what they're talking about?' ["false teeth"? - ed]Memo to self: e-mail Fergal asking him where he got his facts from."I'd love to get these guys alone and ask them if they know where their facts are coming from. They'd crumble!"
At the tattoo parlor, Marcus Gonzales found a list of Chinese characters and picked "strength" and "courage." His Tai-chi teacher finally confessed that they really say "dog" and "puppy."Har har.
Faith Fippinger: victim of American repression of dissent? Hardly. But they're threatening her with a million dollar fine and 12 years in jail, and the loss of her house and pension! Oh no they're not.
While the 21 September article talks only of "up to a million dollars and up to 12 years in jail" it is not telling the whole truth. You see, on 11 August the BBC informed us that "A retired US teacher [Faith Fippinger] who served as a human shield in Iraq has been told she faces fines of $10,000"
So the penalty for travelling to Iraq in breach of the sanctions is a $10,000 fine, with no mention of jail. So where does this "$1M and 12 years" come from? Well, if she refuses to pay the fine then penalties kick in for not paying the fine (as tends to happen with non-payment of fines), which is why she was also sent a "warning that if she did not pay the amount, she faced up to 12 years' imprisonment or a lengthier legal battle that could run to over $1m in costs." The 12yrs and $1M is for non-payment of the fine, not for going to Iraq.
In fact it isn't even that. Reading it again it says "12yrs jail or a legal battle costing up to $1M". The $1M isn't a fine at all - it's the likely maximum cost of the legal fees to defend herself from going to jail.
And quite how a $10,000 fine would result in her losing her house and her pension is not explained: the pension is paid according to a contract between her and the pension company - they can't take that away from her. And it sounds like she owns a house, so it would be trivial for her to borrow $10,000 secured against the house. At her age the loan company would probably be quite happy to waive monthly repayments and instead settle for some arrangement where they take a cut of the value of the house when it is sold after her death: this sort of thing happens fairly routinely with what are called "equity release schemes" in the UK - I don't know whether similar products are available in the US.
So she needn't go to jail, she needn't lose her house and she won't lose her
pension and the penalty for travelling to Iraq is $10,000 instead of 12 yrs in jail and a million dollars.
But apart from that the story's pretty accurate.
(Permanent link to this article)
I always get the shakes before a drop. I've had the injections, of course, and hypnotic preparation, and it stands to reason that I can't really be afraid. The ship's psychiatrist has checked my brain waves and asked me silly questions while I was asleep and he tells me that it isn't fear, it isn't anything important -- it's just like the trembling of an eager race horse in the starting gate.Great book. Dismal film.I couldn't say about that; I've never been a race horse. But the fact is: I'm scared silly, every time.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I especially like this bit of reasoning:
Experience has shown that the general public come forward in their thousands when they believe their sample will help police to detect a serious crime.Clear? Because in certain exceptional circumstances people are prepared to do X, this means that X really should be made compulsory. Anyway, I feel confident that either the police or Home Office will soon put my mind at rest by saying that if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear from this.
I wish it were a cheap and very efficient way of disposing of nuclear waste, but I'll eat my pants if it ever works on anything even remotely approaching an industrial scale (in the between-time I'll eat my hat if they make it work on gram quantities).
LONDON (Reuters) - Britain must introduce personal identity cards for all citizens if it is to combat the threat of terrorism and organised crime, according to the country's most senior police officer.Well at least he didn't say they're for the sake of the children. Be grateful for small mercies.
"We are sure they would have a massively beneficial effect for us in fighting organised crime, human trafficking and terrorism," Sir John Stevens, London's police commissioner, told Reuters.Yes, sir. Of course they will, sir. Nurse will be along with your pills shortly, sir.
He insisted that new biometric technology, which allows personal details such as fingerprint or retina identification to be included, made mandatory ID cards "a must".Either I misread that, or he's been horribly misquoted, or he's saying "Mandatory ID cards are now essential because technology allows more precise measurement and more compact data storage". That's just silly. As silly as saying "Technology now exists to transmit television pictures in colour: this makes mandatory ID cards essential" or "You can get the internet on computers now? Quick: ID cards for everyone!"
"The excuse people say is that terrorists and organised criminals get round it...Not so much an excuse as a bald statement of fact.
...They might do. But in getting round it, it will identify who they are."So backstreet card forgers will know people who are up to no good. Fantastic. The prospect makes me feel safer already.
"What I am totally against is the business whereby we can trace and follow people who have a normal life. ...Got that? He's totally against the ability to trace and follow normal people. No desire whatsoever to snoop on the innocent.
...But we do need to have the ability to identify those people who are around doing their business lawfully...In other words he does want the ability to trace and follow people who have a normal life. Ability to snoop on the innocent is essential. Make your mind up, man.
...and those other people who want to create mayhem and effectively destroy our way of life."Oh spare me. Yes, there are people who want to create mayhem and destroy our way of life, or at least to kill us in large numbers. But given that the people most bent on that are (how else can one put this?) generally of Middle Eastern origin, how specifically does introducing a measure aimed at identifying and tracking UK citizens help us?
"These results do not suggest that persons with abdominal fat should start drinking."Insightful.
Talking about the risk of being blown up by an eager young jihadi during his journey, Martin displays admirable sang froid:
"In fact ... you are probably more likely to be run over by a bus than blown up in one"Let's spend 15 entire minutes with google and see if that's true. Of course an actual journalist has access to much better sources than google, and could have checked personally with the top Israeli road safety scientist to assess the comparative risks of bus detonation and bus collision.
While the numbers of people being run over by buses are hard to come by, according to this study of worldwide traffic deaths Israel suffered 9.3 road traffic deaths per 100,000 population in 1996, and the country has a population of 6.1 million. So if the roads haven't become noticeably safer or more dangerous since 1996 we can expect that 9.3 x 61 = 567 people died in road traffic accidents in Israel over the past year.
By contrast, according to this tally of casualties, the following numbers have been killed by bombings of buses in the past year:
| Date | Number of people blown up in a bus |
|---|---|
| Sept 19, 2002 | 6 |
| Oct 10, 2002 | 1 |
| Oct 21, 2002 | 14 |
| Nov 21, 2002 | 11 |
| Mar 5, 2003 | 17 |
| May 18, 2003 | 7 |
| May 22, 2003 | 9 |
| June 11, 2003 | 17 |
| Aug 19, 2003 | 21 |
| Total : | 103 |