Brought to you by Rob Hinkley, with no warranty either express or implied. Currently featuring...
Archive.
Sept '03.
May '03 - Aug '03.
Dec '02 - Apr '03.
The opinion section, in which Rob spouts off.
Photo albums containing, erm, photos.
The Miscellaneous section.
 
Kitten pictures here,
here, here, here
and here
 
contact: robert dot hinkley at btinternet dot com (my PGP key, and you can get PGP from here)
The Sporadic Chronicle
Not tested on fluffy bunnies
October and November '03
29 Nov 2003.
Dinner was nice, and ever so quick to make. Chilli beef with tomatoes and noodles.
28 Nov 2003.
The British government's "Big Conversation" today opens debate, consultation and database errors to the masses.
A little less conversation, a few more database errors
Ah, it's so comforting to know they know what they're doing.
28 Nov 2003.
There is outrage, and a minister is accused of inciting hatred after including (I paraphrase) "behave yourselves" in an early draft of a speech.
Only an insensitive racist freak could possibly say anything like that. This is opening the doors to people to say "if you don't like it here and can't behave then go somewhere else", and we all know that only a crazed redneck nazi could say something like that, right?
27 Nov 2003.
A man who ate someone he met on a website for cannibals says he's really really sorry and didn't want anyone to make a fuss. Grim, grim, grim.

But I have to admit a slight curiosity about whether they had any fava beans and a nice chianti.


27 Nov 2003.
Gosh. Some people have all the best toys:
These gadgets are not firearms in the legal sense -- they are basically very big muzzle loaders. We typically launch cans filled with concrete a very long way.

27 Nov 2003.
Hooray: my CD burner's arrived. Yeah, I thought you'd be excited.
26 Nov 2003.
A pretentious idiot promising contemporary performance artist sits in a bathful of baked beans (my, how original!).

Previous publicity stunts works include rolling along the pavement, complaining to the council that the sky's too big, strapping poultry to his head, crawling along the pavement with cotton wool in his ears and pushing a monkey nut along the pavement to complain about his student debt.

For the gods' sakes, someone give this man a job on daytime TV - it's clearly what he wants.


26 Nov 2003.
When Parasites Attack!
26 Nov 2003.
A very good Flash animation song video. This is less sophiscated but made me smile.
20 Nov 2003.
The previously unheard of protest group PADAB (Pot-heads And Drunks Against Bush) held its first demonstration in London yesterday:
[Out of 300 protestors] There were three arrests for criminal damage, five for possession of an offensive weapon, four for drunkenness and three for theft [and one] for drink-driving plus possession of an offensive weapon and drugs, [...] two arrests over drugs, five for public order offences, one for assault and five for other offences.

18 Nov 2003.
There was alarm and concern in the City yesterday when OmniCorp's auditors refused to sign off its accounts for the ninth year running. Nah, just kidding: it's only the EU living up to its normal high reputation.
18 Nov 2003.
Even more controversially, Rumsfeld later branded the drowning of kittens 'despicable'.
18 Nov 2003.
Good name for a rock band or concept album: The Mystery Particles.
18 Nov 2003.
Full text of Harold Pinter's open letter to president Bush:
Dear President Bush,
I'm sure you'll be having a nice little tea party with your fellow war criminal, Tony Blair. Please wash the cucumber sandwiches down with a glass of blood, with my compliments.
     Harold Pinter
      Playwright
President Bush is a vampire!
Harold Pinter poem, quoted by Bel Littlejohn (who wants to know what the president plans to do about Big Macs, Coke and Britney Spears):
There's a bomb/Up your arsehole/Chum/And if you want to shit it out/You can't/Chum/Because the president won't bloody let you/Chum.
Not only a vampire, but a constipation-inducing vampire! Must be true, because a playwright says so.
18 Nov 2003.
"Silent majority" news. While veteran protestor grandmothers hang upside-down flags on the palace gates and loud protests are planned to scream and shout at George Bush and pull down a statue of him, actual public opinion welcomes Bush's visit, supports the invasion of Iraq and strongly believes we shouldn't pull out too quickly. And I thought I was the only one.
17 Nov 2003.
Oppressed proletariat: throw off your chains as you read of the revolutionary road to communism in Britain!
17 Nov 2003.
Oh wow, a talking Donald Rumsfeld action figure. I want one of those.
13 Nov 2003.
So there you are, wanting to see "a world based on freedom, cooperation, justice and solidarity" when you hear news of the truckbombing of a police barracks in Iraq. Are your feelings of...
   A: sadness at the brutal futility of war, or
   B: concern for possible deeper meanings, or
   C: pure unbridled joy?
Of course, only one reaction is appropriate for the truly committed anti-imperialist:
Ha ha ha. Fuck the Caribineri fuck! [...]

good news! its about time them fascist fuckers got it [...]

Still a lot of laughs for the many Caribeneri scum who fucked off to hell.
Apparently there are some still buried under the rubble. Ha ha ha!b[...]

And that's in their "Anti-militarism" category. Vile.
[Update 14 Nov. Well that happened quickly - the jubilant posts have been removed. Presumably the moderators thought they reflected badly on the character of the march toward global justice. Google's cache has a copy of the comments.]
[Update part2 - 13 Nov. Google's cache has since updated and removed the earlier comments.]
13 Nov 2003.
A war memorial in Cambridge was defaced on Tuesday by some sick freak(s) presumably trying to make a point about Iraq and, given the monkey images, the proposed Cambridge University primate lab. A man has been arrested but insists 'twas not he that did the deed:
"I do not know who did this - it seems like ill-thought out vandalism."
As opposed to well thought out vandalism. Which rather misses the point that it isn't merely "ill thought out" but instead deliberately insulting and disrespectful.
11 Nov 2003.
La la la, la la la la la... A pot says it is "horrified" by the blackness of the kettle.
09 Nov 2003.
I've just been watching a documentary on Channel 4 about how String Theory might bridge the gap between Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, and everything seemed to be going fine until they started to talk about extra dimensions in space which they insisted are exactly the same as our everyday dimensions, except that they're smaller. And a different shape too. Then I'm afraid that my head started to hurt and I had to stop watching.
08 Nov 2003.
Tariq Ali has replied about the source for his Iraqi casualty figures in the Guardian on the 3rd. I asked
From: robert.hinkley@btinternet.com
To: tariq.ali3@btinternet.com
Subject: Source for "at least 15,000 lives" in today's Guardian column?

In today's Guardian ("Resistance is the first step towards Iraqi independence") you say the invasion of Iraq "cost the Iraqis at least 15,000 lives". Was this based on the study by the Project on Defence Alternatives described as "the most comprehensive account so far of how many Iraqis died" when reported on Wednesday (see http://www.guardian.co.uk/ international/story/0,3604,1072955,00.html)? I imagine not, as that study gives a number of up to 15,000 killed, of which up to 4,300 civilians. If you were using that study as a source it woud have been incorrect to say the invasion of Iraq "cost the Iraqis at least 15,000 lives", but rather the invasion of Iraq "cost the Iraqis at most 15,000 lives".
So I assume you were using another source for your number of Iraqi deaths. I would be glad if you could tell me what that source is, please.
   Regards,
        Rob Hinkley

He replies
From: TARIQ ALI <tariq.ali3@btinternet.com>
To: <robert.hinkley@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Source for "at least 15,000 lives" in today's Guardian column?

Dear Rob:
That was the source, but the 'at least '/'at most' debate will go on. Iraqi sources say that many more died, but were buried hurriedly and not listed, especially the poor. That's why I put 'at least'........
   Best,
        Tariq

To put it mildly I'm not convinced by his reasoning that because the study mentions a maximum of 15,000 dead this means that it can be used to claim that number as a minimum.
05 Nov 2003.
Pure comic gold: Saudi Arabia fears a shortage of sand, going so far as to step up border inspections aimed at catching sand smugglers.
Construction industry experts say that if only some kind of mechanism could be evolved to transport sand from areas like the Rub Al-Khali (the Empty Quarter) then it might become a "very profitable proposition."
That's the catch and no mistake. If only some kind of mechanism could be found to shift a large mass of solids across a desert...
04 Nov 2003.
Gothic horror in the kitchen:
A former leading member of India's Congress party was convicted of murder yesterday for killing his wife, covering her in butter and attempting to roast her in a restaurant's tandoor oven.

04 Nov 2003.
Famous Belgians!
04 Nov 2003.
Further to my comments on the 29th, Dave e-mailed me this link which suggests that men aren't all that France and Germany aren't sending to Iraq:
There is widespread disgust in America, for example, at the Europeans' paltry contribution to the funds that will be devoted to the reconstruction and democratisation of Iraq. Saudi Arabia will provide $1 billion in loans and credits to Iraq. Between them, France and Germany will contribute precisely nothing.
US: $18 billion. Japan: $1.5 billion. France: zero. Germany: zero. Maybe that's mulitilateralism in action.
04 Nov 2003.
I e-mailed Tariq Ali yesterday asking him what his source was for his "at least 15,000 dead" claim in his Guardian column. I haven't had a reply yet but I'll let you know just as soon as I get one.
03 Nov 2003.
Happy birthday to me,
happy birthday to me,
happy birthday to me-eee-eeee...

31. Bloody hell.


03 Nov 2003.
Tariq Ali's in fine form in today's 'Guardian'. If you look closely I think you can actually see the spittle flying out of the corners of his mouth.
As American "postwar" casualties now exceed those sustained during the invasion (which cost the Iraqis at least 15,000 lives)
Wrong. Presumably he refers to this study, which found that up to 15,000 Iraqis (of which up to 4,300 civilians) were killed during the invasion.
The great poets of Iraq - Saadi Youssef and Mudhaffar al-Nawab - once brutally persecuted by Saddam, but still in exile, are the consciences of their nation. Their angry poems denouncing the occupation and heaping scorn on the jackals - or quislings - help to sustain the spirit of resistance and renewal.

Youssef writes: I'll spit in the jackals' faces/ I'll spit on their lists/ I'll declare that we are the people of Iraq/ We are the ancestral trees of this land.

And Nawwab: And never trust a freedom fighter/ Who turns up with no arms/ Believe me, I got burnt in that crematorium/ Truth is, you're only as big as your cannons/ While those who wave knives and forks/ Simply have eyes for their stomachs.

Catchy stuff. Maybe it scans better in Arabic.
In other words, the resistance is predominantly Iraqi - though I would not be surprised if other Arabs are crossing the borders to help. If there are Poles and Ukrainians in Baghdad and Najaf, why should Arabs not help each other?
If there are Poles and Ukrainians in Baghdad and Najaf, why should Arabs not help each other?
Cunning, Tariq, very cunning. You see what he did there? If the Americans and British were alone in occupying Iraq then it would be an example of classic colonialism and outrageous unilateralism. If there are 30 other countries also involved then that means it's perfectly natural for Syrians to come and blow up the Red Cross.
Meanwhile, Iraqis have one thing of which they can be proud and of which British and US citizens should be envious: an opposition.
Yeah, Tariq, whatever. Only this morning I thought to myself "The Tories are really rubbish and the Labour Party has an unassailable parliamentary majority. I really wish people were blowing up car bombs in the streets." I feel so envious.
02 Nov 2003.
It looks like the Great Driverless Car Race has run into some administrative snags.
02 Nov 2003.
"This exhibition certainly has the opportunity to put Dudley on the map."

Indeed it has. Unfortunately the map in question is the "point and snigger" map.


02 Nov 2003.
Rush hour rail chaos caused by mobile phone toilet farce.
30 Oct 2003.
Bad Movies dot org: devoted to bad cinema. "Just when you think a film cannot get any shinier or flashier, here comes a man waltzing around in an aluminum foil suit."
30 Oct 2003.
Many people seem to be outraged that George Bush appeared under a banner reading "Mission Accomplished" aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln in May, and that the White House supplied the banner. This, they claim, is an egregious example of the lying deceptive filthy lying lies Bush flings around. Get a grip, people.

The specific task (or "mission") for the aircraft carrier and crew had been to fly planes to support the troops and defeat the Iraqi army. They had successfully completed (or "accomplished") that mission. Hence "Mission Accomplished". The same was true for most coalition units - they had successfully completed their tasks to that date. The banner did not say "Everything Done & Dusted" or "No More Problems In Iraq Now" or "War Over, Peaceful Tranquility Ahead". The actual speech he gave specifically mentioned there was hard and difficult work still to do in Iraq, which would take time.

The crew of an aircraft carrier asked the White House to provide them with an accurately worded banner, and they did. Wow. Scandal City.


29 Oct 2003.
Posting seems to have taken a turn toward the serious lately, so to balance it out here's news of possibly the world's cutest rodent: a micro-hamster less than one inch long. Awhhh, look at the little mutant freak...

29 Oct 2003.
Two thoughts and a small dose of spleen about the occupation of Iraq.
  1. Regarding unilateralism and the lack of UN involvement. We're getting help from Albania and Azerbaijan and Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Poland, Georgia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Ukraine. Also joining in are the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua, Denmark, Hungary and Italy, Moldova, the Netherlands and New Zealand. Also Norway, the Philippines, Portugal, South Korea, Spain and Thailand, Kazakhstan, and Macedonia. I make that 30 countries as well as the US and UK, contributing over 15,000 troops. How many countries have to be involved in something before it ceases to be unilateral? Notably absent are those stalwarts whose governments were so brimming with concern for the Iraqi people and the spirit of multilateralism pre-war: France, Germany and Russia. Note also the absence of Iran, Syria, Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, who presumably prefer to bitch from the sidelines rather than chip in doing anything constructive. As far as the all-important UN involvement is concerned, when nearly 1/6th of the UN's members are putting their people on the ground, how can it be said that the UN is not involved?
  2. Regarding the motives of the "Stop The Occupation" brigade. The week after the fall of Baghdad, Marina Hyde wrote in the 'Guardian' about her opposition to the war and there was a revealing sentence in the article about the reasons for her stance:
    No, even had there been no civilian deaths, had it lasted 40 minutes, had bunting clogged the streets of Baghdad, it was always the threat of future US imperialism and the bitter fallout from those who'd feel alienated by it that concerned most people opposed to this war.
    In other words "I did not give a fig for the welfare of the Iraqis. That talk about wanting to prevent Iraqi civilian deaths was just so much camoflauge to cover my real position. I would prefer them to stay miserable and afraid than for the Americans to score a victory."
    I suspect a lot of this thinking is behind the opposition to the "American" (and Albanian, Azerbaijani, Bulgarian, Slovakian, Dutch, Nicaraguan, Danish, Honduran, Thai, Kazakh...) occupation. Even though those most vocally opposed to the occupation may say they are motivated by concern for the welfare of Iraqis what really concerns them above all is that America must not win, and what's good for the Iraqis isn't really important.

29 Oct 2003.
Following from yesterday's post, this post about French nuclear doctrine is brought to you by the Corrections And Clarifications Dept. Reading the 'Liberation' article more closely I'm not so sure Chirac was talking about pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons:
Jacques Chirac talked of "the development by certain states of ballistic missile capability which could give them, one day, the means to threaten European territory with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. If they were driven by hostile intentions toward us, the leaders of these states must know that they are exposing themselves to unacceptable damage." Specifically, an atomic attack against the "centres of political, economic or military power".
So I may have been wrong about pre-emptive use, as he could just have been issuing a reminder about a nuclear response to chemical or biological attack. Their interest in mini-nukes seems real enough though.
28 Oct 2003.
Jacques Chirac fails to deny a shift of French nuclear doctrine toward pre-emptive strike against rogue states threatening to use chemical or biological weapons, and a French defence ministry staffer explains that the development of a new family of much smaller nuclear warheads is desireable to allow even the most strongly fortified bunker to be destroyed, noting "It's troublesome to say you'll melt 30 million people in the event of a crisis. A more credible solution is to target a bunker and explode a nuclear warhead inside".

Contrast the silence greeting the news of this doctrinal shift with the loud outrage when the Americans reminded people of the decades-old doctrine to use nuclear weapons against those who use chemical or biological weapons against them, and announced the development of a new family of much smaller nuclear warheads to allow even the most strongly fortified bunker to be destroyed.

American mini-nukes: bad, crazy unilateralism! French mini-nukes: nuanced and sophisticated!


27 Oct 2003.
Wanderings with my camera.
Heads carved on cathedral wall (note monster at left and bloke with glasses at right), and a couple of trees.

24 Oct 2003.
I don't know about you, but I will sleep more soundly at night knowing that EU law is keeping us safe from the scourge of non-standardised marmalade. But isn't there a kind of chutney called "onion marmalade"? Quick: reconvene the Maramalade Definition Committee! Either that or they could recategorise the onion as a citrus fruit...
21 Oct 2003.
Postings seem to have been very serious of late, so it's time to lighten things up a little with a frivolous link frenzy:
21 Oct 2003.
Oh no, Chinese people found working in Kings Lynn! For some reason this makes politicians think that Britain needs to spend £1 billion on introducing ID cards, presumably to save us from the scourge of industrious Chinese people. This prompted me to go on at some length about the supposed value of ID cards against illegal working.
19 Oct 2003.
Oh dear, Dominique de Villepin's on BBC1 right now giving the Dimbleby Lecture. To summarise:
Blah blah, blah blah blah. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah? Blah blah blah! Blah blah blah...
etc.

I really can't stand that man. He couldn't be any more weaselly if he sprouted whiskers and a twitchy snout.


19 Oct 2003.
I found a full transcript of that speech Mahatir Mohamad gave on Thursday and I've put up a copy of it here. No, he wasn't quoted out of context. No, he wasn't just talking about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He did describe the West and the Jews as enemies. He did say it was time to unite, plan, and attack these enemies.
18 Oct 2003.
Oh look, another audio message from someone sounding like Osama Bin Laden. We've had a lot of these audio messages but we haven't seen any unambiguously recent video footage of Osama lately. In fact we haven't seen any proveably recent video or photos of him since, oh... around that time the Americans surrounded his Impregnable Mountain Fortress™ and started bombing it round the clock. I mean, come on, I know that posing holding up a newspaper is cliched but at least it would show that he hasn't spent the last 18 months scattered in small pieces across a remote hillside or as a patch of scorched gristle stuck on a cave wall. How difficult could that possibly be? To paraphrase from 'Pulp Fiction':
"Whose war is this?"
"It's a jihad, baby."
"Whose jihad is this?"
"It's Osama's."
"Who's Osama?"
"Osama's dead, baby. Osama's dead."

16 Oct 2003.
Just as I was thinking "it's about time for news of an amusingly frivolous lawsuit", along comes an amusingly frivolous lawsuit.
16 Oct 2003.
Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad reckons the world is being secretly ruled by the jews. Hmmm, lets see: small group of jews running the world holding everyone else back, the need to respond to this shadowy cabal by building strong armed forces, racial employment and education policies to counter the influence of overly wealthy foreigners... I can't help feeling that I've read that sort of stuff before somewhere.

There's more detail of the speech here.

Mahathir said they could at least take a common stand on the Palestinian struggle against Israel and it was time to plan a "counter-attack" against the enemies of Islam who treated Muslims with "contempt and dishonour". ...
"[The Jews] invented and successfully promoted socialism, communism, human rights and democracy so that persecuting them would appear to be wrong, so they may enjoy equal rights with others.
"With these they have now gained control of the most powerful countries and they, this tiny community, have become a world power.
"We cannot fight them through brawn alone, we must use our brains also," he said.
"Of late because of their power and their apparent success they have become arrogant. And arrogant people like angry people will make mistakes, will forget to think.
"They are already beginning to make mistakes. And they will make more mistakes. There may be windows of opportunity for us now and in the future. We must seize these opportunities."
Oh yes, it's that old hitlerian favourite the "International Bolshevik Jew" who's been busy inventing and promoting communism. And while fighting the Jews with brawn is good it's just not sufficient. Someone give this man his medication. This is the start of the conference, so at this rate the Syrian president will give a speech tomorrow about how the aliens are using mind control beams and abduction to secretly control the Human race.
15 Oct 2003.
Just found this:
Anti-war activists including the Guardian columnist George Monbiot are planning to form a coalition to challenge the Labour party in the European and local elections in June.
Must... stop... laughing. Lost deposits all round, methinks.
13 Oct 2003.
Don't let anyone say that the staff of Antarctic research stations don't eat well. They can have as much savoury seal brains on hot buttered toast with grated cheese as they can eat. Sounds, erm... delicious.
13 Oct 2003.
Oh wow (again): thought-controlled robot arms! Potentially a very important step toward much better prosthetic limbs.
13 Oct 2003.
Oh wow: laser-powered aeroplanes!
08 Oct 2003.
A Which Muppet are you? quiz.
Another Which Muppet are you? quiz.
08 Oct 2003.
A study in internet discussion board social stereotypes.
08 Oct 2003.
When Dustbins Attack.
06 Oct 2003.
Hmmm. This analysis by Barbara Plett, BBC correspondent in Ramallah, takes us to a world where it seems everything is the fault of America and Israel, the Syrian government is a paragon of virtue and there are no such things as "terrorists":
Syria is, of course, Israel's enemy. The two countries are still in an official state of war, caused by Israel's occupation and illegal annexation of the Syrian Golan Heights.
Ah yes. This state of war is caused by Israel's illegal occupation of a Syrian mountain range. Bad Israel. If only Israel gave Syria its mountains back everything would be fine. Why, if Israel had given the mountains back in 1972 then all those Syrian soldiers wouldn't have had to break sweat climbing over the mountains on Yom Kippur in 1973. That way Israel could have been pushed into the sea and we wouldn't have this ongoing conflict.
And since the beginning of the Palestinian uprising, Israel has increasingly focused on the Palestinian opposition groups hosted by Syria.
First they're not "terrorists", they're "militants". Then they're not "militants", they're "opposition groups". A lot like, say, the Conservative Party, or the Democratic Party. Conservative Party, meet Islamic Jihad, your fellow Opposition. Prediction: the next step will be for Islamic Jihad to be described as "modernisers", or perhaps "progressives"
[Members of the Palestinian Authority acknowledge Syrian support for Islamic Jihad, al-Aqsa Walking Bomb Brigade etc...] In response to Syria's anti-war, anti-occupation stance, the US has demanded that it clean up its act to fit the new regional order - one that increasingly defines all armed resistance, whether in Iraq or other occupied Arab territories, as "terrorism."
See, the Americans have demanded that Syria stop supporting terror gangs not in response to its support for terror gangs (sorry, I mean "opposition groups") but because of Syria's support for peace and liberty, which displeases the warmongering oppressive Americans.
According to diplomatic sources, Damascus also urged the exiled Hamas and Islamic Jihad leaderships to accept the unilateral Palestinian ceasefire declared in June.
They did, but the truce has since broken down.
Just how much LSD does someone have to have taken to believe that Hamas and Islamic Jihad actually observed any cease-fire?

Update 08 Oct: the text of the third paragraph on the BBC website has changed since I wrote this - the "Last Edited" time is wrong.


06 Oct 2003.
Laugh-a-minute official news bulletins from North Korea. Japan's Anti-DPRK Campaign Blasted! Slogans for Immediate Struggle Announced! Portable medical apparatus developed! Sacred struggle against U.S. called for! Kim Jong Il's Work Published in Italy!
Leader Kim Jong Il's famous work "Let Us Exalt the Brilliance of Comrade Kim Il Sung's Idea on the Youth Movement and the Achievements Made under His Leadership" was brought out in booklet on September 20 by the Publishing House of the Peace and Socialist Movement of Italy.
And I'm sure it's positively flying off the shelves.
06 Oct 2003.
When Pets Attack.
06 Oct 2003.
When Meteorites Attack.
01 Oct 2003.
Musicians have long sought inspiration by ingesting mushrooms. In the 21st century musicians can also seek inspiration by listening to mushrooms.
"I simply record music that a mushroom sings to me," he said... "Not all of them carry the same tune," Mr Halek said. "There are tones and melodies that only toadstools and mushrooms make, so that together they cannot be used to create a composition." He also claims to hear music coming from rocks and trees but prefers mushroom melodies.
(Thanks to Michael for the link)
01 Oct 2003.
The Society For Research Into The Bleeding Obvious has found that fat children taunted about being fat suffer a drop in self-esteem and a rise in fat-related anxiety. They have also discovered that signs which indicate a child is experiencing emotional distress include: And trying to humiliate them will increase the child's emotional difficulties.

We wouldn't know any of this stuff if it wasn't for groundbreaking research like this.


Previous edition.