Brought to you by Rob Hinkley, with no warranty either express or implied. Currently featuring...
Archive.
Oct '03, Nov '03.
Sept '03.
May '03 - Aug '03.
Dec '02 - Apr '03.
The opinion section, in which Rob spouts off.
Photo albums containing, erm, photos.
The Miscellaneous section.
 
 
Kitten pictures here,
here, here, here
and here
 
 
contact e-mail: address (my PGP key, and you can get PGP from here)
The Sporadic Chronicle
Sometimes people just can't be pleased.
December '03, January '04
31 Jan 2004
I'd been saving up a set of links to assorted museums for a rainy day, and it's raining now so...
29 Jan 2004
They've just interviewed George Soros on BBC2's 'Newsnight' about how much he hates Bush for being a lying liar and why everyone should buy his new book. But Soros himself had only been talking for about a minute when he lied through his teeth to accuse Bush of lying, saying that "In this last State of the Union speech, Bush said they have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq already". No, Mr Soros. What Bush actually said was:
... We are seeking all the facts - already the Kay Report identified dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related programme activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations. Had we failed to act, the dictator's weapons of mass destruction programmes would continue to this day. ...
And I thought it was Bush who was supposed to have difficulty with basic comprehension.
29 Jan 2004
Sorry to return to this subject, but why is the BBC covering bribery allegations against an ex French minister when a sitting British MP is named in the same papers? Surely it is more important to the British licence-fee payers who fund the British Broadcasting Corporation that a serving British MP (who has just founded a new party and wants support from British voters) is accused of being in the pay of a murderous despot. Far more important than what some retired Frenchman is accused of. To repeat, from 'Le Monde':
[...] George Galloway, ex Labour MP, figures prominently in the list. His name is mentioned in 6 contracts and the newspaper publishes a letter from [the old Iraqi State Oil Company] dated 31 December 1999, signed by Saddam Zbin, cousin of Saddam Hussein in which he asks the oil company to give him contracts. Apparently, this British MP was particularly well treated. [...]

29 Jan 2004
If you're ever in Shanghai, make sure you look where you're putting your feet.
28 Jan 2004
And who, my preciousssssss, did Saddam have in his pocketses? Politicianses! At least, so it is alleged by the BBC, quoting 'Le Monde', who are quoting an Iraqi paper called 'Al-Mada'. From 'Le Monde':
[...] Abdel Saheb Salmane Qotob, under-secretary with the ministry for oil, [allegedly] assures us this information specifies that among the [allegedly] named persons are two Prime Ministers, two Foreign Ministers as well as a string of ministers and Heads of State. [...] George Galloway, ex Labour MP, [allegedly] figures prominently in the [alleged] list. His name is [allegedly] mentioned in 6 contracts and the newspaper publishes a letter from [the old Iraqi State Oil Company] dated 31 December 1999, [allegedly] signed by Saddam Zbin, cousin of Saddam Hussein in which he [allegedly] asks the oil company to give him contracts. Apparently, this [alleged] British MP was particularly well treated. But he wasn't the only one [...]
Allegedly.
28 Jan 2004
It snowed last night, which is the first snow we've had in ages. Waking up to find it snowed during the night always makes me feel as if I'm about five years old.
View from kitchen window this morning
27 Jan 2004
Christ, ITV have really scraped the D-List to come up with the "I'm a Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here!" contestants this time. I mean, honestly, who on Earth are any of these people? Jordan and her implausible breasts? Yewgh.
27 Jan 2004
I think I have identified the section of voters to whom George Galloway's new party is trying to appeal. They're after the Very Angry Voter, such as Nikolai.

Feel his anger. Anger at George Bush Jr. Anger at JFK, and all presidents. Anger at the UN. So much anger at Denis Thatcher(!) that he laughs when he dies. Anger at Charles Kennedy. Anger at rugby. Even anger at the 'Darkness'. Grrr, he's a very angry man and he's voting for 'Respect'.
[Update: Now he's even angrier than ever]
[Update part deux: now he's angry at me.]


27 Jan 2004
The North Korean Central News Agency certainly knows how to write headlines: "Japan's Brigandish Assertion Assailed", and "Brutalities of U.S. Imperialist Aggressor Troops Denounced".
27 Jan 2004
"43% of jurors fail to grasp details " says the headline, and then the report itself tells us "Only 43% said they understood everything that was happening ..."
Which might lead people to ask once again "do Guardian headline writers actually read the articles"?
[Update: they've changed the headline now to bring it in line with the article]
26 Jan 2004
Laugh - it's funny. The "great movement" being led by George Galloway and assorted coffee-table revolutionaries has descended into a squeeling territorial catfight before it's even started:
London's mayor, Ken Livingstone, has threatened to sue a fellow maverick of the Labour movement, George Galloway, if the rebel MP refuses to change the name of a new political alliance he has founded. Mr Livingstone says the current name - Respect: the Unity Coalition - will clash with the Respect anti-racist festival in London. [...]
*sigh*.
All together now...
    "Judean People's Front?"
    "No, we're the People's Front of Judea!"
    "SPLITTERS!"

Idle thought: if there were 1,000 people at the meeting and they were charging £10 to join the party on top of the £10 entrance fee (according to a promotional poster I saw) they took over £10,000 yesterday. Might this be a new moneyspinner for George Galloway to keep himself in the style to which he is accustomed following the abrupt halt of any alleged inflow of alleged funds from any alleged paymaster?


24 Jan 2004
It looks like the Spirit probe on Mars can be repaired, but maybe not brought back to full health. Still: better to have a half-full glass than a totally broken one.
24 Jan 2004
This is absolutely inspired: The Brick Testament, where old and new testament bible stories come to life through the medium of lego. Genius.
24 Jan 2004
A few good links:
23 Jan 2004
This is a difficult call - is Jenny Tonge an active terror sympathiser or simply an unmitigated idiot? I don't really have any more to say about this than what Anthony and Tim have already said.

No, that was wrong - I do have more to say. From the Guardian:

Dr Tonge, the spokeswoman on children, told a meeting of the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign on Wednesday: "This particular brand of terrorism, the suicide bomber, is truly born out of desperation" [and] "killings and the bulldozings and all the other horrible things" ...
Yes, the day-to-day bulldozings and desperation certainly explain this sort of thing, right?

More wisdom of Jenny Tonge on terrorism, from BBC 'Any Questions', 9th January 2004:

"Well I sometimes worry that we're taking it all too seriously and making too much of it but I think we have to give everyone the benefit of the doubt and say that we are in a very serious situation ..."
Quick, someone tell the Israelis: just don't take it all so seriously. The link to that transcript on BBC site seems to be broken.
22 Jan 2004
Who would have imagined that the simple question "How to cook the perfect grilled cheese sandwich?" would spark such a torrent of heated debate? (Link found via the marvellous 'I Love Sandwiches').
22 Jan 2004
I can't let this pass without comment: the RAF is being accused of ignoring Auschwitz despite having photographed it in some detail, with newspaper 'Bild' asking:
Why therefore were the extermination camps not destroyed after the reconnaissance planes of the Britons and Americans photographed them in such detail? At the very least, the railway tracks on which the Jews were transported into the extermination camp?
They back this up by quoting one Hans-Ulrich Wehler (a guest professor at Harvard University, no less) to show that we knew what the extermination camps were but didn't do anything:
"why the infrastructure - for example the railway lines - were not destroyed is still unclear today."
Oh yeah, that's a puzzler and no mistake...
"Maybe it's because the allies' main focus point was the industrial centre of western Germany."
Smart of him to notice that there was a war on. There's another thing to consider as well: the extermination camps were located in Southern and Eastern Poland. The planes the RAF had at the time which were capable of any sort of precision attack were the Mosquito and Typhoon, which had maximum ranges of about 2000km and 1500km (1200 and 900 miles) respectively. Professor Wehler may not have noticed quite how far it is from Britain to Eastern Poland.
Britain to Eastern Poland: at least 800 miles (1300km) as the crow flies, via Berlin.
It's really quite a long way. Something like 800 miles (or 1300km), and that's flying in a straight line. But of course you couldn't fly in a straight line because that takes you right over Germany and via Berlin, where there are people who would object quite strongly and shoot at you. So any practical route would be more circuitous, adding probably hundreds of miles in each direction. So a round trip to attack railway lines in Eastern Poland would involve flying, say, at least 2000 miles (3200km). The planes would simply run out of fuel and crash - the Typhoon would run out of fuel before it even reached its target. The camps were within range of heavy bombers like the Lancaster and the American B17 but they, with rare exceptions, weren't able to attack with any precision.

So the mission would have been physically impossible, and the air forces were busy elsewhere:

"The number of men lost in air action [in Europe] was 79,265 Americans and 79,281 British. More than 18,000 American and 22,000 British planes were lost or damaged beyond repair."
Practically sitting around idle, heh, professor Wehler?
22 Jan 2004
There is skullduggery afoot in the House of Saud...
21 Jan 2004
Correction to previous post: France has not banned religious beards. Rather, a minister has said he would like to ban religious beards. Sorry! I still think it's getting altogether too silly.
21 Jan 2004
Having banned people from booing the national anthem last year, and the wearing of religious clothing and insignia in public buildings this year, France decides to top it off by banning beards (well, sort of).
He also says beards worn for religious reasons would be prohibited.
Ferry said Sikh turbans would be allowed if they are "discreet," but didn't elaborate further.
Regulating facial hair, forbidding skullcaps and headscarves while permitting turbans (or at least stealth turbans)... this is fast becoming like a Monty Python sketch. I half expect Graham Chapman to appear dressed as an army officer, saying "Stop, stop! You'll have to stop that now. It's getting altogether too silly" at any moment.
21 Jan 2004
More from the Mars probe at Astronomy Picture of the Day: a rock.
"[The probe] will now attempt to determine the rock's composition and history by prodding it with its sophisticated mechanical arm".
Oooh... not only do we go to Mars but we prod rocks when we get there.
20 Jan 2004
When wheelie bins attack!
20 Jan 2004
In Finland, hardly anything slips past the keen-eyed tax man without getting noticed.
19 Jan 2004
More from the Mars probe at Astronomy Picture of the Day: a closeup of Martian soil. Exciting, isn't it?
19 Jan 2004
Well I never: taking brain-scrambling drugs might affect the brain, scientists discover. Mind you, I'm less than impressed by the method of their research:
The findings are based on a web-based survey completed by people throughout the world [...]
Are web-based surveys really a good way to conduct medical research?
19 Jan 2004
How odd:
EU officials are banning air passengers from taking potential weapons such as fishing rods, snooker cues, ice skates, ski poles and skateboards onto planes. [...]
Skateboards?
18 Jan 2004
Good news! I just got a phone call from Tom saying that Pootle is back home after vanishing for nearly a week, waking him up at 5 o'clock this morning by miaowing in his ear. She's a bit skinny but unhurt. I'm so happy.
17 Jan 2004
(Warning: contains pictures of naked people) - Naked Protestors, because nothing says "I have an important point to make which deserves to be taken seriously" more effectively than stripping off your clothes in public like a petulant child. Or painting your face as a bloodied skull and flashing your tits painted with "DIE BUSH DIE" (that's, erm... just German for "The Bush, the").
16 Jan 2004
A prison guard sacked last year for insulting that nice Mr Bin Laden has won his case for unfair dismissal. The prison governor gets a roasting from the tribunal:
"Conduct by the governor was reprehensible, totally unjustified [...] He seemed determined to justify a course of action which seemed wholly disproportionate [...] we wondered whether the governor lived in the real world." [...]
But the Prison Service is unrepentant:
A spokesman said: "We are very disappointed by the decision of the tribunal. The decision had already been found to be fair by an internal Prison Service appeal and the Civil Service Appeals Board, which is completely independent. The decision to dismiss Mr Rose was fully consistent with Prison Service policy . . . to eradicate racism in prisons." [...]
*sigh*.
16 Jan 2004
More Mars probe goodness from Astronomy Picture of the Day.
16 Jan 2004
"Where's my sense of humour?" asks Madeleine Bunting in the Guardian today, announcing that "the Sun's thuggish tactics against Clare Short are an attack on us all". And what is the Sun's thuggish behaviour? Making personal attacks on Clare Short. Fair point: personal attacks on someone over things like their appearance or accent or background aren't big or clever. Of course the Guardian would never do anything like that, right?
15 Jan 2004
Lost Daleks come home.
15 Jan 2004
Everybody should have some ambition.
"I always wanted to be the first woman to carry out a martyr attack, where parts of my body can fly all over," she said, smiling. "That is the only wish I can ask God for."
Personally, I always wanted to be an astronaut.
14 Jan 2004
I half expect tomorrow's Guardian letters to contain a response to my letter along the following lines: "It's ridiculous to compare Kilroy-Silk with Michael Moore: Kilroy-Silk's an inflammatory racist but Michael Moore's a comedian and satirist. How can there be inaccuracy in comedy?". Just in case, I respond pre-emptively thus:

Do any of us imagine for a moment that if Kilroy-Silk had turned around and said "What's the matter, can't you people take a joke?" the whole fuss would have blown over? No. Me neither.


14 Jan 2004
Today's Astronomy Picture of the Day is a Mars panorama from the Spirit probe. Wow.
14 Jan 2004
Oooh! Oooh! Following from my earlier comments, I'm in the Guardian. This is getting to be a habit.

For the record, the e-mail they've published has been edited. Here's what I originally sent:

Faisal Bodi claimed (Islamophobia should be as unacceptable as racism, Monday) the Salman Rushdie affair "was wrongly characterised as free speech versus censorship". If it wasn't about free speech versus censorship I'd like to know what it was about.

Compare and contrast the treatment of Kilroy-Silk with that of Michael Moore. Michael Moore wrote a book titled "Stupid White Men" which contains a chapter titled "Kill Whitey" blaming white people (quite generally) for every earthly ill from the plague to slavery, from pollution to the holocaust and even the theft of Michael's stereo. The book sold millions of copies, there was no outcry about offensive racial stereotyping, the Guardian ran special features interviewing him so he could plug his next book. Both Moore and Kilroy-Silk are dunderheads. Neither ought to be prosecuted.


14 Jan 2004
So, Iran is still acquiring machinery to enrich uranium. And why would they be doing that, I wonder?
13 Jan 2004
The government proposes to create a fund to compensate crime victims by increasing fines on offenders. But wait, what's this:
Also under the proposal, the drinks industry could be asked to contribute towards the cost of compensation because of the large number of alcohol-related violent incidents.
I like the wording: "asked to contribute". Not "obliged" - just "asked". Like I can imagine the following conversation taking place...

GOVERNMENT: Would you put some money into our new fund, please?
BREWERIES: No.
GOVERNMENT: Oh. Not to worry. Thanks anyway.

Doesn't the drinks industry already contribute through the assorted taxes on its products? Next up, cutlery industry "asked" to contribute due to the high number of knife-related violent incidents.


13 Jan 2004
I have bad news: Pootle the tiny but sometimes overambitious cat has gone missing from Tom's flat, last seen on Sunday night. Not that I believe in this, but could all suitably qualified readers please offer prayers to Saint Gertrude of Nivelles for her safe return? It can't hurt. I've got my fingers crossed hoping she comes back and that this won't be needed.
12 Jan 2004
The tacky postcard archive. And Julie's tacky treasures.
12 Jan 2004
More from wanderings with my camera on Saturday:
Rooftops. Fire escape, courtesy edge detection software.

12 Jan 2004
Some paragliding photos, including their best of 2003 and the Potato Hill collection.
12 Jan 2004
Cat pictures from the dark side: cats painted in the progression of psychosis of a schizophrenic artist (more about that here, with his paintings before illness here).

Also: portrait drawings under the influence of LSD. "Upon completing the drawing the patient starts laughing, then becomes startled by something on the floor."

Thanks to Michael, for the links.


12 Jan 2004
Faisal Bodi* writes in today's Guardian that Robert Kilroy-Silk should be prosecuted for making his stupidly over-generalised comments about Arabs:
During the Salman Rushdie affair in 1989, he wrote that if Britain's "resident ayatollahs" could not "accept British values and laws then there is no reason at all why the British should feel any need, still less compulsion, to accommodate theirs". Buoyed by the support of liberals in a debate that was wrongly characterised as free speech versus censorship he went much further.
Three points about that. Firstly, the message about accepting British values and laws appears to have been directed at "Britain's resident ayatollahs", not at all British Muslims. Secondly, a call to "love this country or leave it" is hardly in itself evidence of rabid racist hate-mongering. Finally, if the Salman Rushdie affair wasn't about free speech versus censorship I'd like to know what it was about.

Compare and contrast the treatment of Kilroy-Silk with, say... Michael Moore. Michael Moore writes a book titled "Stupid White Men" including a chapter wittily titled "Kill Whitey" blaming white people (quite generally) for every earthly ill since the black death to slavery to pollution to the holocaust and even the theft of Michael's stereo. The book sells millions of copies, he becomes a darling of the Guardian-reading demographic, and the Guardian runs special features interviewing him. Both Moore and Kilroy-Silk are dunderheads. Neither ought to be prosecuted.

*Faisal Bodi is a commentator on Muslim affairs who commentates that Muslims who support Tony Blair are "stooges", and whose imam extended Friday prayers after September 11 to implore God to annihilate Islam's enemies, to "rock the ground underneath their feet". Makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside, doesn't it?


11 Jan 2004
More gratuitously cute kittens than you can shake a stick at. In fact, you'd have to have a heart of stone to even think of shaking a stick at them.
10 Jan 2004
Wanderings with my camera today:
Wet path. Wet path, with contrast artificially heightened.

10 Jan 2004
He asks, I answer. Note these are not the films I would rate as the greatest (most important or most influential in the history of cinema), just the ones I find most interesting or enjoyable to watch. In strictly alphabetical order:
09 Jan 2004
A man from Leeds has grabbed the world record the largest appendix ever removed, smashing the previous record by an inch and a quarter. Makes you feel proud to be British, does that.
08 Jan 2004
Praise and criticism: Tim Newman says he likes my site but that it "makes his eyes go funny". Is it just him with funny eyes, or is it only me who can stand my page layout? I'm no graphic designer (you might have noticed) so please - let me know if I am responsible for visual distress and what I might to do to heighten your reading convenience. I might send Tim a lavender eye pillow to soothe his eyes after reading here.
08 Jan 2004
Uh-huh-huh - Happy 69th birthday, Elvis... wherever you're hiding.
07 Jan 2004
Bechtel is awarded a contract in Iraq and the BBC stirs the murky waters of corruption and payoffs to party donors, telling us...
Both the firms awarded the $1.8bn deal - Bechtel and Parsons - are already on the ground in Iraq. Bechtel's existing deal is worth about $1bn.
Both are also major donors to the ruling Republican party and President George W Bush's 2000 election campaign.
... without mentioning that Bechtel is also a "major donor" to the opposition Democratic Party, if "major" is even the right word for total donations to both parties of less than half a million dollars in 2000 when the big and expensive presidential race was on. They don't look quite so major when compared to what other organisations donate, a chart of recent donations which puts Bechtel in 246th place, way behind such corrupt bribe-merchants as Home Depot DIY stores and Ocean Spray Cranberries ("the war - it's all about the soft fruit!").
07 Jan 2004
Martin Bove writes in the Guardian's letters page:
It's good to see some new blood being introduced into the Guardian Comment page. While Bin Laden's writing style is perhaps a little flowery, his opinions provide much-needed balance to those of the equally illiberal David Aaronovitch.
Osama Bin Laden and David Aaronovitch are "equally illiberal"? It's funny, but I must have missed David Aaronovitch's announcements about the need to kill all those who don't agree with him and smash women's heads with rocks for being insufficiently modest in public. Martin Bove must have read more of Aaronovitch's work than me.
06 Jan 2004
Uh-huh-huh, it's the Elvis sighting bulletin board. There's another one here, along with a Princess Dianna sighting board which is sort of creepy.
What would we do without the Internet, heh? Well for a start we wouldn't be able to find quality tasteful merchandise like these nesting Elvis Russian dolls, that's for sure.
06 Jan 2004
Syrian President Assad's latest diplomatic overture: "We won't give up our WMDs until Israel does, not we have any you understand. PS, can we have the Golan Heights back now please?". Yes, folks, it's time for a bit of semi-informed punditry:

Firstly, the Israelis are not going to give back the Golan Heights. They'd have to be on drugs to give a hostile country the mountain range which sits on their border.

Secondly, the Israelis are not going to disarm until they feel a lot safer about their neighbours. Now Iraq's out of the picture the only countries in the region committed to Israel's annihilation are Libya, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Iran. That means disarmament needs the cooperation of Israel and 7 Arab/Persian countries. In any agreement between 8 countries every country is going to assume that at least one of the others is going to cheat at some point - it would be naive of anybody making a bargain with 7 people they don't trust to imagine that nobody's going to cheat. While the Arab/Persian countries have little to fear from at least some of the others cheating Israel would be totally screwed if they disarmed and any of the 7 other countries cheated. As Israel will expect at least one of the Arab/Persian countries to cheat on any disarmament deal Israel won't disarm. Not, at any rate, until Israel trusts the other countries in the region not to wipe it off the map.


06 Jan 2004
Well I never: a study has shown that psychiatric drugs have different effects on brain chemistry than talking/doing therapies. Who'd have thought it?
05 Jan 2004
In a ceremony in Baghdad, Ken The Human Shield is going to burn his passport in protest (wooooooh!):
And now I shall let my personal venom flow and commit the following act of defiance in condemnation of the illegal invasion and ongoing occupation and mass murder of the Iraqi people by my birth nation of the United States. The burning of my passport is an exercise in the inherent human right of self determination in accordance with international law after having my U.S. passport returned to me twice by the U.S. Department of State.
The bastards! They returned his passport. Twice. Cruelty like that mustn't go unresisted.
My personal act affirms once and for all the lawful and undeniable completion of my renunciation of U.S. citizenship that began on March 1, 2001. I AM NOT A UNITED STATES CITIZEN! I am a lawfully registered World citizen in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) with ultimate allegiance to my entire human family and to planet Earth.
I'm sure that the fact a man with a habit of issuing verbose and meaningless statements, verbosely wasting the time of Dutch bureaucrats and drawing silly "Bush = Hitler" comparisons is going to burn his passport will shake the American government to its very foundations.
In what is a monumental irony Ken Nichols O’Keefe, the initiator or the Human Shield Action to Iraq that attracted the attention of world leaders and more importantly people around the globe, was forced under duress, to request a U.S. passport at the American Consulate in Rome on February 12, 2003. This request became necessary after the Turkish Government unlawfully deported of Mr. O’Keefe and thus prevented his peaceful transport through Turkey, on his way to Iraq to act as a Human Shield. Had Mr. O’Keefe not made his reluctant request he could have been denied the inherent right to travel to Iraq
Heh, that was funny. What happened was that Ken turned up in Turkey en route to Iraq in February last year carrying only his "Citizen of the World" passport instead of his more conventional US variety. And what did the Turks do when this guy turned up at their border with a piece of paper they'd never seen before, issued by people they'd never heard of? They outrageously denied his "inherent right to travel" around their country. Shocking! On an even more comical note, just imagine the exchange that must have taken place later in the American Consulate in Rome:
Clerk: Can I help you, sir?
O'Keefe: [mumbling] I'd like a passport, please.
Clerk: I'm sorry, you'll have to speak up.
O'Keefe: I'd like a passport, please.
Clerk: Oh. Did you lose your last one?
O'Keefe: No! I destroyed it in an act of solidarity with the oppressed peoples of the world!
Clerk: Because you deliberately destroyed it I'm afraid there will be a replacement fee of $80.
O'Keefe: Ha, I despise the very notion of money: an oppressive construct of the capitalist hegemony to crush the struggling masses!
Clerk: No money, no passport, sir.
O'Keefe: Oh. Well... here's your 80 filthy dollars then.
Clerk: And you are a US citizen?
O'Keefe: No! I AM NOT A UNITED STATES CITIZEN! I am a lawfully registered World citizen...
Clerk: Sir, are you a US citizen?
O'Keefe: ... in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with ultimate allegiance to planet Earth!
Clerk: Are you are a US citizen, sir? You see I can't issue you with this passport if you aren't a US citizen.
O'Keefe: [mumbling] Well, urm... yes, yes I am a US citizen. But I don't like it, you know.
I'm going out on a limb here, but I can see Ken in a couple of month's time walking into an American consulate and getting another passport when he finds out that being a US citizen and able to prove it is quite amazingly convenient. If nothing else, he'll find it hard to get to the Gaza Strip and party it up with Hamas or chase after the press pack travelling on a Citizen of the World passport.
05 Jan 2004
Assorted mushroom-related trivia:
05 Jan 2004
Vint Cerf in a very silly hat. Assorted trivia:

03 Jan 2004
Shock and horror as US soldiers plunder, desecrate holy site in Iraq!
Surrounded by upturned chairs and an abandoned turban, Sabah Al-Kaisey surveyed his ransacked office yesterday.
The American troops who burst into his mosque on Thursday morning had smashed down the front gate, broken the air conditioners and ripped up the carpets. They had also thrown several Korans on the floor and allegedly punched the man giving the call to prayer in the face.
Oh, that's bad.
"They even took our nuts," said Mr Kaisey yesterday...
Ow, but that's so much worse.
... opening the door of the mosque's empty fridge.
Oh, you mean those sort of nuts. Who keeps nuts in the fridge, anyway? So why were those plundering, smashing, mosque-desecrating yankee stormtroopers there?
The troops who raided the Ibn Taymiyah mosque, used by Baghdad's Sunnis, appear to have been looking for weapons used by Iraq's resistance.
Aha, the old "looking for weapons" excuse for a bit of desecration...
They recovered a couple of AK-47s, hand grenades and an anti-aircraft missile, US military officials said.
So not so much "appear to have been looking for weapons" as "were looking for weapons, which they found". And what does the victim of the plunder and desecration have to say?
Abdul Sattar, the mosque's imam, said the weapons were used by its guards. "They were there to protect ourselves," he told the Arabic TV station Al-Jazeera...
An anti aircraft missile? And according to Al-Jazeera the missile was accompanied by more than a couple of AK-47s, specifically "three packages of TNT explosives, a 60 mm mortar tube, eight improvised grenades, bomb-making equipment, two rocket-propelled grenade launchers, 11 assault rifles and two bags of gunpowder". All of which were of course just being used by the mosque's guards to deter burglars and maybe the occaisional door-to-door salesman who calls while they're eating. Everyone has mortars, grenades, anti tank rockets and an anti aircraft missile stashed away to protect their place of worship, right?
...which showed images of the damaged Korans.
I bet they did. According to khilafah.com, which also leads with the desecration and Koran-trampling, they found "a surface-to-air missile, two rocket-propelled grenade launchers, grenades, a 60 mm mortar tube, a 120 mm mortar stand, bomb-making equipment, and other weapons".

Isn't "US soldiers ransack Sunni mosque" a slightly odd choice of headline? Surely "US soldiers sieze arms cache" or "Mosque used as arms dump" would have been more honest.

And according to this, the raid wasn't just carried out by US soldiers, but by Iraqi police as well. Following months of tip-offs that the mosque was being used as an arms dump. So not quite as brutal a ransacking and desecration as first reported.

On Friday, 500 people held a vigil inside the mosque after prayers and shouted: "Bush, Bush, you are the devil" and "We are the soldiers of Allah."
Yeah, yeah, whatever. Talking about "soldiers of Allah", that reminds me of a radio interview I heard with a US Marine sergeant shortly after they'd first flown into Afghanistan in late 2001. Asked how he felt about facing soldiers of Allah waging holy jihad he answered "Al-Qaeda and the Taliban want to fight the infidel and go to paradise. The US Marine Corps looks forward to providing them every possible assistance in that matter". That's always stuck with me.
03 Jan 2004
Oliver Kamm came across someone calling themselves Tom Young on Indymedia declaring that evidence of mass graves in Iraq is fabricated and denouncing Ann Clwyd as a lying liar. Pretty loathesome, but not a one off. Seek and ye shall find...

Tom insisting that evidence of the deaths of Uday and Qusay Hussein is fabricated, because he thinks their funeral looks a bit odd.
Tom insisting that evidence of mass graves near Salam Pak is fabricated, because holes have been dug with mechanical diggers and some men are pictured trying to lift something heavy.
Tom insisting that evidence of mass graves near Najaf is fabricated, because a corpse's blindfold looks too fresh to him.
Tom insisting that other evidence of mass graves near Najaf is fabricated, because sand dunes all look the same to him. Or, as he puts it: "This is one concerns the 'I was shot and left to die in a mass grave, but crawled out under cover of darkness to tell all' variation, an old favourite in the mass grave atrocity genre."
Tom insisting that evidence of mass graves of children in Iraq is fabricated, because he can't seem to imagine anybody murdering children.
Tom insisting that evidence of Saddam Hussein being captured is fabricated, because he thinks his facial hair doesn't look right.
Tom expressing yet more doubts about that whole "capture of Saddam Hussein" thing. And again.
Tom responding to critics.
Tom insisting that evidence of mass graves in Kosovo is fabricated, because some earth has been removed by a mechanical digger.

I have yet to find him claiming that evidence of the Apollo moon landings was fabricated, but I'll keep looking.


03 Jan 2004
Having myself pontificated about the need for other people to declare their interests in matters, I feel obliged to point out that I have placed £100 with William Hill on George Bush to win this year's presidential election. So if you notice me using my access to literally dozens of readers to twist US public opinion through lying lies you at least know why.
Here endeth the declaration of interests.
03 Jan 2004
So our little blue planet in space (possibly the best Christmas present ever - thanks, Dad!) begins another trip round the sun. I am now back home after the Christmas holiday, trying to find space on groaning bookshelves for the new additions. As it seems to be popular to publish new year's resolutions and predictions for the year ahead I see no reason not to follow slavishly and do likewise.

Resolutions:

  1. I will back up my files better and more often.
  2. That's all. There is no "second resolution".

Predictions for the year ahead:

  1. There will be no end of fevered press reports about George Bush's "immediate" and "urgent" plans for a "massive" withdrawal of American forces from Iraq before November's election.
  2. There will be no significant withdrawal of American forces from Iraq. Maybe a few thousand here and there, but nothing massive.
  3. There will be no end of fevered press reports about George Bush's attempts to shore up his "dwindling domestic public support" prior to November's election. Words like "frenzied", "frantic", "hopeless" and even "increasingly desparate" or "pathetically futile" will be used aplenty to describe these efforts.
  4. In November, George Bush will wipe the floor with his opponent.
  5. The Israelis will bomb the Iranian nuclear plants. Yes, I know I said that before and it didn't happen, but...
  6. When Israel bombs the Iranian nuclear plants CND will be outraged.
  7. My computer will die, and I will be totally screwed because it will be at least 6 months since I backed up any of my files.

29 Dec 2003
I had a look around Gateshead's new art gallery in the old Baltic flour mill building today. It's a very fine building in danger of falling victim to Millenium Dome Syndrome, in which a great building languishes because of the absence of anything decent to put in it. Currently on display are 3 floors of works by Nancy Spero and Kiki Smith, which (according to the pamphlet) "addresses issues of the feminine across cultures and mythologies" and "draws attention to thematic, cultural and physical affinities existing in the work of these two artists". Perhaps so, but to my untrained eye they looked like junk and scrawlings untainted by any obvious trace of skill. Photography was prohibited so I am unable to illustrate this, but... just trust me.

The remaining floor contained an exhibition of artists' books "selected by a group of invited artists, critics, historians, curators and collectors". People, whatever you do, don't allow an artist, critic, historian, curator or collector to recommend reading matter. The most interesting thing on display was a table with a pile of books next to a fish tank, and this was only because the fish tank contained some real live fish, which was nice. Incredibly, this is on display for eight months.

And please don't bother to write telling me "But it's art, darling" because it's not: it's just crap. Harrumph.

Baltic Gallery, seen through Millenium Bridge.

29 Dec 2003
RIP Bob Monkhouse, who has departed for the great variety performance in the sky.
28 Dec 2003
I missed this good news when it happened. Good news, anyway.
28 Dec 2003
Hunting for a poem? Try Poem Hunter.
28 Dec 2003
Gosh. Build dams: get attacked by piranha fish, apparently.
25 Dec 2003
And so the family Hinkley gathers in the ancestral home for Christmas. In keeping with family tradition the day started with a short walk in the morning, this year along the river near Hartburn. Highlight: an artificial cave (below) complete with fireplace someone supposedly cut into the riverbank in years gone by so that he and his friends would have somewhere dry to change their clothes when they went swimming in the river. This way
A rough-hewn portal! Brother provides sense of scale

23Dec 2003
UK mobile users can now get daily text messages from the Pope. Will they be written in textese, I wonder: Jsus is gr8?
23Dec 2003
It's a turkey shoot!
23Dec 2003
I like cats, but even I will acknowledge that sometimes they go too far.
22 Dec 2003
Fantastic motorbike riding game.
22 Dec 2003
Oh no: GI in despot-punching war crime atrocity shocker!
Saddam Hussein spat at American soldiers moments after his capture and was promptly punched by one of them, according to US government sources. ...
Heh. Wait for it... "They beat up their prisoner! They violated his rights! Waaaaaaaah!!!!"
19 Dec 2003
About bloody time: the hazardous doctor famed for his inexpert witness court appearances is at long last being formally challenged about them. The news is also in the Scotsman if the Telegraph's funny ("odd", not "ho ho") registration thing gets in your way.
19 Dec 2003
Announcing a slight update to the structure of this site in response to a tsunami (erm, well, at least a ripple) of reader comments. Entries from this month on will now be permalinked at the address linked to by the date of the entry.
18 Dec 2003
I saw "Lord Of The Rings" last night and I thought it was good, even if they could have shortened it by about 15 minutes by taking out a number of redundant scenes of hobbits blubbing and saying how much they love one another in stupid West Country accents:
[The scence: Mordor. Frodo looks wistful]
"Oh Sam, I don't know what I'd have done without you"
"Oh shut up and get on with destroying The One Ring, Mister Frodo"
"But really, this quest is as much an exploration of the meaning of friendship and loyalty as it is of good and evil don't you think?"
"Yes yes, Mister Frodo, whatever. "
"Ariwiwiii, fgiiieooooo... awiiiiiii..."
"Oh no, Mister Frodo, not Elvish poetry! Just shut up and walk, Mister Frodo please before the audience gets restless."
[Frodo starts blubbing]
etc.
But all round it gets a thumbs up. What gets a definite thumbs down was one of the films they showed a trailer for: called something like "Stuck On You" or "Stuck Together" or... "Stuck somehow". I sat there staring at the screen with a sense of growing incredulous horror as the trailer unfolded and the awful truth dawned. To summarise, this artistic masterpiece is a hapless duo caper movie a bit like "Dumb and Dumber" with (and here's the hilarious twist) siamese twins! Yes - that's right, conjoined twin comedy mayhem, permitting such roll-in-the-aisle punchlines as "We're not Siamese, we're American!" and visual gags including an awkward lurching walk and our hapless heroes getting trapped on opposite sides of a sliding door. This is it: "Stuck on you". See, I wasn't making that up.
18 Dec 2003
Crazed animal rights group sinks to level of tasteless self-parody:
Germany's self-confessed cannibal killer Armin Meiwes has been sent a vegetarian cookbook and a Christmas hamper full of veggie burgers and tofu. [...] Peta spokesman Juergen Faulmann said: "What this man did to a German computer expert is done to other creatures every day." [...]
Oh well, what else to expect from a group who tried to sue the government for not taking proper care of wild deer when one of their own activists crashed his car into a deer?
18 Dec 2003
Take a tour of the medieval Newcastle quayside, or a tour of modern Christmas time Newcastle (specifically, scroll down to where you get the pictures of the carol singers, and read the text...) - belated thanks to Becky for that link.
18 Dec 2003
Gah! Someone - a very senior policeman I think - was on 'Today' on the radio this morning saying that because Ian Huntley used two names (Nixon & Huntley) it was this cunning disguise (and not at all the fact Humberside police had decided to file a dozen rape and sexual assault cases in the bin) that had got him the job at the school and "this makes the case for biometric identity cards even more strongly".

No doubt this assertion will be repeated endlessly until it becomes commonly accepted, but it is nonsense. Allow me to respond with simple words:

Huntley gave both his names to Cambridgeshire police via the school. They say they gave both his names to Humberside police. Humberside police knew perfectly well who he was, but they just screwed up. Stop saying "If only we had had Magic Gizmo X this would not have happened", because Magic Gizmo X would have had no effect in this case and no number of magic gizmos will stop people from screwing up in future.


17 Dec 2003
I got not one, not two, but three 419 spams today. With luck I might be able to craft replies to get all of them thinking that one of the others is authorised to act as my agent, and allow them to run in their own little loop wasting each others' time. Anyway, 'tis very late (I've just back from seeing Lord Of The Rings - about which more tomorrow).
17 Dec 2003.
The Owl Pages (all about owls).
16 Dec 2003.
Who came out with this hawkish rhetoric of the regime changer:
Saddam Hussein is responsible for Nazi-style barbarities, setting out to be the regional superpower, gathering the technology to threaten Israel, being the prime protector of Palestinian terrorism, putting on show trials and arbitrary executions. The price of a policy of appeasement which perpetuates Saddam's regime can be measured in dead and broken bodies. Is it not patronising, if not shameful, to dismiss the desires of the people of Iraq, many of whom have died and been tortured in protest at Saddam Hussein?
Condaleeza Rice in January 2001? Donald Rumsfeld or George Bush in March 2003? Nope. The 'Guardian'. No, really. Or more specifically an 'Observer' editorial in March 1990, shortly after Saddam had one of their journalists executed:
[...]
The truth is that we are humouring a dictator, which is rather like negotiating over hostages, which, as Mrs Thatcher keeps reminding us, never pays. Nor does it make sense to talk, as Ministers do, of the overriding imperatives of trade and exports. It is these very exports, many of them concerned with arms and military technology, which have helped to create the monster who ordered yesterday's anti-British demonstrations in Baghdad.

We should know our enemy. Since his war with Iran, in which he engaged in Nazi-style barbarities, Saddam Hussein has set out to be the regional superpower of the Middle East, gathering the technology to enable him to threaten Israel, making himself the prime protector of the PLO, sending arms to the Christians in Lebanon to upset the Syrians and forming a network of alliances with Jordan and the Gulf states in which he is the senior partner. Britain's policy of appeasement towards him has been based on the belief that he is the most useful force against Communism on the one side and Islamic fundamentalism on the other.

The execution of Farzad Bazoft provides one more illustration of the failure of this appeasement policy. Hussein cannot be controlled by words and messages, no matter how eminent and how well-meaning the senders. A man who unleashes chemical weapons against his own people is not likely to restrain his use of the same weapons against any other enemy - or nuclear warheads once he gets hold of them. The second anniversary of the massacre by gas of the Kurds of Halabja is a good time to remember this.

If Farzad Bazoft's death has achieved anything, it has been to focus world-wide attention on the barbarities of Saddam Hussein, of which Farzad himself was just the latest victim. Britain may be right to seek to retain it historic and cultural relations with the people of Iraq, but anything it does to perpetuate Saddam's regime can be measured in dead and broken bodies. Hussein is a ruler who will continue to perpetuate the most horrendous acts of cruelty against his own people as well as his guests. Morality as well as national self-interest requires us to underline the values of fair trial, fair treatment and free expression, which are not ethereal ideals but principles by which we judge ourselves and by which we have every right to judge others. Nor are they confined to this island. All over the world freedom is breaking out, even in South Africa, Latin America and Eastern Europe.

Does it really serve our long-term purposes in the Nineties to side with Saddam Hussein and lend him our money when so much of the world is crying out for help in achieving nobler aims? And is it not patronising, if not shameful, to dismiss the desires of not the people of Iraq, many of whom have died and been tortured in protest at Saddam Hussein?
[...]


16 Dec 2003.
Oh, lordy, Type 4 whining direct from the Vatican:
A top Roman Catholic official has attacked the way Saddam Hussein was treated by his US captors, saying he had been dealt with like an animal.
Well no, I'd say he was dealt with like a shabby despot who had just been found in a hole. And what is the treatment that the Cardinal finds so distressing?
Cardinal Renato Martino said he had felt pity watching video of "this man destroyed, [the military] looking at his teeth as if he were a beast".
They looked at his teeth! Oh, the inhumanity. Looking at his teeth... that's almost as bad as smashing his teeth out and then electrocuting him, right?
Cardinal Martino said on Tuesday that the US "could have spared us these pictures".
"Seeing him like this, a man in his tragedy, despite all the heavy blame he bears, I had a sense of compassion for him," he told reporters.
Cardinal Martino weeps for Saddam's tragedy. Each to his own, I suppose.
14 Dec 2003.
Hey, look what someone found under a rock. Saddam's been caught, and not after any Glorious Last Stand Fight To The Death either, but after quite literally being dug out of a hole in the ground.

Expect the whining to start almost immediately. Expected whines will include, but not be limited to:

  1. "Oh, we're meant to believe that's really Saddam Hussein - like the real Saddam Hussein wouldn't put up a fight? Yeah, right..."
  2. "Oh, how convenient for Bush. Just as he's looking bad in the opinion polls they suddenly 'find' Saddam Hussein..."
  3. "Now they've proved Saddam's alive this will only encourage those loyal to him to fight."
  4. "He's being mistreated by the imperialist aggressors, who are violating his human rights."
  5. "He won't get a fair trial."
My, that was quick - I've already found an example of Whine Number 4, from the typographically challenged Cat at indymedia:
Saddams face shown in violation of the grniva convention.
At approixmatly 18:00 yesterday american and Kurdish forces began an opperation to catch Saddam. They did.
This morning the americans relesed fotage of saddam was this in breach of the geniva convention?

12 Dec 2003.
Further to what I said here, I got e-mail back from the Labour Party yesterday saying that the 'Big Conversation' is funded entirely by the Labour Party, without any public money going towards it.
12 Dec 2003.
Neil Kingsnorth of CND asks:
So the defence secretary wants a streamlined, efficient, lightweight fighting force (Pre-budget report, December 11)? I wonder if he's aware of his enormous nuclear arsenal...
Well he is defence secretary, so I imagine he's aware of it. Either that or life at Westminster is even more like 'Yes Minister' than I ever imagined:
The Scene - the office of the Defence Secretary, who is sat at desk. Sir Humphrey enters.
Sir Humphrey: I have your briefing notes for this afternoon's meeting about the UK nuclear arsenal, minister.
Defence Secretary: UK nuclear arsenal?
Sir Humphrey: Yes, minister.
Defence Secretary: What, you mean we have nuclear weapons?
Sir Humphrey: Yes, minister.
[Defence Secretary, stunned by the news, falls off chair in surprise]
... and US and UK plans to develop new nukes?
I wonder if Neil Kingsnorth is aware of French plans to develop new nukes? I couldn't find anything on the CND website about that. Or Iranian plans to develop new nukes and "wipe Israel off the map"? The only stuff I could find on the CND website about Iran was "the alleged Iranian nuclear weapons program isn't good, but the US and UK are guilty of hypocrisy". If US plans are considered worthy of comment then surely other foreign countries are noteworthy as well.
09 Dec 2003.
Yet more proof that NASA faked the moon landings. Might be slightly lost on those unfortunate souls not exposed to the quality 1970's British children's TV experience that was The Clangers.

The complete Clangers on DVD! I want, I want, I want...


09 Dec 2003.
More coming soon on Noam Chomsky's denial he ever predicted a genocide in Afghanistan - including e-mail from the Great Man himself - just as soon as I've formatted it all. I absolutely promise to get it all posted within the next 24 hours... unless I get distracted or too tired and have to spend my time snoozing instead. Never say I don't move heaven and earth to bring quality content to my readers as fast as humanly possible. Here it is.
09 Dec 2003.
Many thanks to Scott Burgess of the Daily Ablution who mailed me say that the letter to the Guardian I wrote about on the 2nd was in fact a hoax, at least according to Atticus in the Times.
The letter claimed to come from her and was on headed notepaper bearing her home address. Except that it was a forgery and the paper now accepts it was hoaxed. Owusu, who is in Ghana designing a public transport system for the capital, Accra, is not amused. Expect a grovelling Guardian apology this week.
I am happy to set the record straight but won't grovel, as I trusted the Guardian not to print anything which they hadn't thoroughly checked for accuracy first (no, really).
06 Dec 2003.
The Guide to Wacky Court Cases (thanks, Michael!).
06 Dec 2003.
Impressive picture of a cloud which probably sparked any number of UFO reports.
06 Dec 2003.
Clay pigeon shooting is old and boring. Clay kitten shooting, however, is new and exciting (game: no real kittens are hurt).
04 Dec 2003.
Create your very own Picasso picture with Mr Picasso Head. Cool. Mr Picasso Head.

04 Dec 2003.
In the Independent Noam Chomsky is asked
"Where is the 'silent genocide' you predicted would happen in Afghanistan if the US intervened there in 2001?", to which he answers...
"That is an interesting fabrication, which gives a good deal of insight into the prevailing moral and intellectual culture. First, the facts : I predicted nothing. ..." (my emphasis)

Perhaps Professor Chomsky's memory fails him. Let's see what he said on the subject here:

Prominent linguist and writer Noam Chomsky defined the situation [planned invasion of Afghanistan] as a form of genocide. "Plans are being made on the assumption that they may lead to the death of several million people. Very casually, with no comment and with no particular thought about it. It looks like what is happening is some sort of silent genocide," said Chomsky.
and here (cached at google if the original can't be reached):
Chomsky's talk last night focused on the September 11 disaster and its implications within and outside the U.S., [...] He expressed his astonishment at the reaction of people in U.S. and Europe over the situation in Afghanistan. "Seven to eight million people are on the urge of starvation in Afghanistan now," he said, "but there has been no reaction to the stopping of food delivery trucks through Pakistan since the bombings have started.
"This is a silent genocide,"
and here:
He returned consistently to the theme of ending violence, stopping terrorism and warding off the impending "silent genocide" of starvation that US bombings could cause millions of Afghans by making food delivery impossible.
That sounds to me a whole lot like he was saying exactly that US action will cause a silent genocide. In fact the second reference quotes him as saying there is a silent genocide happening as he was speaking, let alone a possible one in the future.

Meanwhile, in the Independent, Chomsky continues ...

"I reported the grim warnings [...] that the attack might lead to an awesome humanitarian catastrophe [...] All of this is precisely accurate and entirely appropriate. The warnings remain accurate as well, a truism that should be unnecessary to explain. "
Urm. Yeah. Who can forget the Terrible Afghan Famine of 2001?
(Update, 09 Dec 2003 - e-mail with Chomsky and more about this here.)
04 Dec 2003.
Ah-ha! Another example of those American multinationals monopolising trade with their Iraqi colony. Erm, no, hang on...
And what's this supposed to mean, anyway:
The US Government has said it will spend $18.6bn on rebuilding Iraq.
While most of that money will finance the US military presence ...
Not according to this it won't, which shows $51bn for military purposes and a totally different $18.6bn for reconstruction.
(Update, 06 Dec 2003 - the report has now been edited to correct the "$18.6bn will finance the US military presence" mistake: the last edited time is wrong.)
04 Dec 2003.
Tale of technical woe, as the panto's due to start but the backstage crew are still battling with the splosh machine...
03 Dec 2003.
Java applet goodness:
02 Dec 2003.
Awwwh: gratuitous kitten photography.
02 Dec 2003.
Ah, there's nothing quite as entertaining as a moral bandwagon picking up speed. Elsie Owusu OBE writes to the Guardian to say that she's considering returning her OBE:
Two issues have made me rethink my acceptance, and I am considering returning the "honour". One is the jingoistic reaction in the press regarding the English (not British) rugby victory. The idea of a vainglorious parade is exclusive of the whole ethnic-minority population of this island and redolent of Anglo-Saxon imperialism.
Oh, get a grip, it's only rugby. There's more...
This rugby jolly has already cost £10m that should have been spent on relieving poverty for the black urban underclass, or perhaps funding sports facilities for those impoverished nations forced to compete on such unfair terms. Sports such as rugby must be privately funded by the wealthy few.
Erm, does rugby actually receive any public funds at the moment anyway? I could be wrong but I doubt it. There's more...
Second, I echo the sentiments of Benjamin Zephaniah, on declining an OBE, regarding the empire, a symbol of England's brutal past.
Elsie got her OBE in June this year. She doesn't tell us what specifically has happened in the last six months to make the British empire suddenly so distasteful. And please, Elsie, just make your mind up. What was the point of writing to the newspaper saying that you're thinking about it?
01 Dec 2003.
The government's Big Conversation seems to have ironed out its website database errors now, but there's still something odd about it. It is being promoted as an attempt to get in touch with public opinion and absolutely not a cynical exercise in Labour party propaganda promotion. Okay. Right.
Observe http://www.bigconversation.org.uk: opinion-gathering for the formulation of better government policy, in a high-minded and entirely nonpartisan exercise. Now trim off the "www" from the address to visit a different branch of the same website...
Observe http://bigconversation.org.uk: Labour Party self promotion - "Join Labour ... Labour's great ... Labour's acheivements... Buy Labour Party merchandise... volunteer for Labour... donate money to Labour..."

I've e-mailed them to ask whether this whole sorry charade is receiving any public money or whether the Labour Party is at least paying for it themselves. Of course, as soon as I get an answer you'll be the first to hear what they said.


01 Dec 2003.
God, this is depressing. The nursery school teacher from hell (right) takes the class (below, left & right) on an outing to a rally in Gaza of groups opposed to the 'Geneva Accord' - the unofficial peace plan which goes further than the current 'Road map'. Don't forget, kids: wear your Islamic Jihad headbands, wave your Islamic Jihad flags and shout those slogans loudly! If you're lucky and work really hard you might even get to blow yourself up in a crowded restaurant some day!
Taking kids along to a rally in support of a peace plan, to wave national flags - I don't have a problem with that. But taking them to a rally opposed to a peace plan more generous than any you can hope to be offered, to wave flags and sing songs glorifying murderous self-destruction... that's just sick.
Those children are doomed.
(Pictures via yahoo from Reuters/Jerry Lampen and AP/Kevin Frayer).
Mon Dec 1, 8:17 AM ET
A Palestinian teacher tells children to wave Islamic Jihad flags and shout slogans against the Geneva Accord, during a gathering of groups who oppose to the agreement, in Gaza City, December 1, 2003. A symbolic Middle East peace plan dubbed 'the Geneva Accord' is due to be launched in a ceremony in Switzerland on Monday. By laying out steps to overcome longstanding obstacles to a 'two-state solution' in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the document goes beyond a U.S.-backed 'road map'. REUTERS/Jerry Lampen
Mon Dec 1, 8:32 AM ET
Palestinian kindergarten children carry Islamic Jihad flags during a protest against the Geneva Accord agreement, in Gaza City, December 1, 2003. A symbolic Middle East peace plan dubbed 'the Geneva Accord' is due to be launched in a ceremony in Switzerland on Monday. By laying out steps to overcome longstanding obstacles to a 'two-state solution' in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the document goes beyond a U.S.-backed 'road map'. REUTERS/Jerry Lampen Mon Dec 1,11:01 AM ET
Palestinian children, wearing headbands from the miltant group Islamic Jihad, who were brought to the event by school authorities, chant slogans at a gathering of groups opposed to the Geneva Accord in Gaza City, Monday, Dec. 1, 2003. Israeli and Palestinian peace negotiators on Monday gathered to launch their unofficial initiative to end one of the world's most intractable conflicts in the presence of Jimmy Carter and other winners of the Nobel peace prize. But the tightly guarded guest list, strong opposition from Prime Minister Ariel Sharon (news - web sites) and last-minute dissension Sunday within Palestinian ranks underscored the problems facing the plan that resulted from two years of secret negotiations. (AP Photo/Kevin Frayer)

Previous edition. Next edition.